Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27681039›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Potential of Liquid and Vapor Phase Phenolic Essential Oil Compounds against Oral Microorganisms.

Tong-Hong Wang, Shih-Min Hsia, Chi-Hao Wu, Shun-Yao Ko, Michael Yuanchien Chen, Yin-Hua Shih, Tzong-Ming Shieh, Li-Chuan Chuang, Ching-Yi Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Viable, Multi-Drug-Resistant Bacteria Recovered from E-Liquids Used with Commercial Electronic Cigarettes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Anti-Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antibacterial Effects of Theaflavins againstFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Insects · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tong-Hong WangTissue Bank, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Shih-Min HsiaSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Hao WuSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shun-Yao KoGraduate Institute of Medical Science, College of Health Science, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Michael Yuanchien ChenDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yin-Hua ShihMind-Body Interface Lab, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tzong-Ming ShiehDepartment of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Care, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Li-Chuan ChuangDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ching-Yi WuInstitute of Oral Biology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWChang Gung University · TWChang Gung University of Science and Technology · TWChang Jung Christian University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the antibacterial activities of the phenolic essential oil (EO) compounds hinokitiol, carvacrol, thymol, and menthol against oral pathogens. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus mutans, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Escherichia. coli were used in this study. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), bacterial growth curves, temperature and pH stabilities, and synergistic effects of the liquid and vapor EO compounds were tested. The MIC/MBC of the EO compounds, ranging from the strongest to weakest, were hinokitiol (40-60 μg/mL/40-100 μg/mL), thymol (100-200 μg/mL/200-400 μg/mL), carvacrol (200-400 μg/mL/200-600 μg/mL), and menthol (500-more than 2500 μg/mL/1000-more than 2500 μg/mL). The antibacterial activities of the four EO phenolic compound based on the agar diffusion test and bacterial growth curves showed that the four EO phenolic compounds were stable under different temperatures for 24 h, but the thymol activity decreased when the temperature was higher than 80°C. The combination of liquid carvacrol with thymol did not show any synergistic effects. The activities of the vaporous carvacrol and thymol were inhibited by the presence of water. Continual violent shaking during culture enhanced the activity of menthol. Both liquid and vaporous hinokitiol were stable at different temperatures and pH conditions. The combination of vaporous hinokitiol with zinc oxide did not show synergistic effects. These results showed that the liquid and vapor phases of hinokitiol have strong anti-oral bacteria abilities. Hinokitiol has the potential to be applied in oral health care products, dental materials, and infection controls to exert antimicrobial activity.

Identifiers

PMID27681039
PMCPMC5040402
OpenAlexW2527031680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.