Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27680982›Full record

ArticleJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2016

Patient-derived Mammosphere and Xenograft Tumour Initiation Correlates with Progression to Metastasis.

Rachel Eyre, Denis G Alférez, Kath Spence, Mohamed Kamal, Frances L Shaw, Bruno M Simões, Angélica Santiago-Gómez, Aida Sarmiento-Castro, Maria Bramley, Mohammed Absar and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Mouse Models of Metastasis and Dormancy.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Anti-EGFR Antibody-Drug Conjugate Carrying an Inhibitor Targeting CDK Restricts Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Growth.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A human vascularized microtumor model of patient-derived colorectal cancer recapitulates clinical disease.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Rachel EyreBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Denis G AlférezBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Kath SpenceBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Mohamed KamalBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Frances L ShawBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Bruno M SimõesBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Angélica Santiago-GómezBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Aida Sarmiento-CastroBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Maria BramleyPennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Mohammed AbsarPennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Zahida SaadSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Sumohan ChatterjeeSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Cliona KirwanUniversity Hospitals of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ashu GandhiUniversity Hospitals of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Anne C ArmstrongThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
Andrew M WardleyThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
Ciara S O'BrienThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
Gillian FarnieCancer Stem Cell Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK.
Sacha J HowellThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
Robert B ClarkeBreast Biology Group, Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK. robert.clarke@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2015NOVPR651Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health NIHR-CS-011-014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer specific mortality results from tumour cell dissemination and metastatic colonisation. Identification of the cells and processes responsible for metastasis will enable better prevention and control of metastatic disease, thus reducing relapse and mortality. To better understand these processes, we prospectively collected 307 patient-derived breast cancer samples (n = 195 early breast cancers (EBC) and n = 112 metastatic samples (MBC)). We assessed colony-forming activity in vitro by growing isolated cells in both primary (formation) and secondary (self-renewal) mammosphere culture, and tumour initiating activity in vivo through subcutaneous transplantation of fragments or cells into mice. Metastatic samples formed primary mammosphere colonies significantly more frequently than early breast cancers and had significantly higher primary mammosphere colony formation efficiency (0.9 % vs. 0.6 %; p < 0.0001). Tumour initiation in vivo was significantly higher in metastatic than early breast cancer samples (63 % vs. 38 %, p = 0.04). Of 144 breast cancer samples implanted in vivo, we established 20 stable patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models at passage 2 or greater. Lung metastases were detected in mice from 14 PDX models. Mammosphere colony formation in vitro significantly correlated with the ability of a tumour to metastasise to the lungs in vivo (p = 0.05), but not with subcutaneous tumour initiation. In summary, the breast cancer stem cell activities of colony formation and tumour initiation are increased in metastatic compared to early samples, and predict metastasis in vivo. These results suggest that breast stem cell activity will predict for poor outcome tumours, and therapy targeting this activity will improve outcomes for patients with metastatic disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreastBreast NeoplasmsCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease ProgressionFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceNeoplasm MetastasisProspective StudiesBreast cancerMammosphereMetastasisPatient-derived xenograftsStem cell activity

Identifiers

PMID27680982
PMCPMC5159442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.