Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27680304›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2017

Predictors of HIV-related risk perception and PrEP acceptability among young adult female family planning patients.

Danielle B Garfinkel, Kamila A Alexander, Reagan McDonald-Mosley, Tiara C Willie, Michele R Decker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health Care Providers' Reported Barriers to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation Among Cisgender Women.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle B Garfinkela Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Kamila A Alexanderb Department of Community - Public Health , Johns Hopkins School of Nursing , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Reagan McDonald-Mosleyc Planned Parenthood of Maryland , Johns Hopkins Hospital , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Tiara C Willied Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Yale School of Public Health and the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University , New Haven , CT , USA.
Michele R Deckere Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
INTERDISCIPLINARY HIV PREVENTION TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH020031 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Trace S Kershaw · 1999 to 2026
$12.1M
Inderdisciplinary Training on Preventing and Addressing Violence in FamiliesT32HD064428 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JACQUELYN CUTLER · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD064428NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) presents new opportunities for HIV prevention. While women comprise approximately 20% of new HIV infections in the US, significant questions remain about how to most effectively facilitate PrEP uptake for this population. Family planning clinics are a dominant source of health care for young women and support an estimated 4.5 million women annually. We explore characteristics associated with HIV risk perception and PrEP acceptability among young adult women seeking reproductive health services in a high-prevalence setting. A cross-sectional, clinic-based survey was conducted with women ages 18-35 (n = 146) seeking health care at two family planning clinics in the greater Baltimore, Maryland area, from January to April 2014. An estimated 22% of women reported being worried about HIV risk, and 60% reported they would consider taking a pill daily to prevent HIV. In adjusted models, HIV-related worry was associated with having no college education, being single or dating more than one person, practicing consistent condom use during vaginal sex, and having ever traded sex. PrEP acceptability was significantly associated with being Black (71% vs. 49%, AOR 2.23, CI: 1.89-2.64) and having ever traded sex (83% vs. 58%, AOR 4.94, CI: 2.00-12.22). For women with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV), PrEP acceptability was significantly lower (57% vs. 62%, AOR .71, CI: .59-.85) relative to their non-abused counterparts. Results suggest that family planning clinics may be a natural setting for PrEP discussion and roll-out. They should be considered in the context of integrating HIV prevention with reproductive health services. Women with a trauma history may need additional support for implementing HIV prevention in the form of PrEP.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultBaltimoreBlack or African AmericanCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansMarital StatusPerceptionHIV preventionPrEPrisksex workviolence

Identifiers

PMID27680304
PMCPMC5553279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.