Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27679985›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Clinical presentation and outcomes for adult ependymoma patients.

Alvina A Acquaye, Elizabeth Vera, Mark R Gilbert, Terri S Armstrong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03251989 (Exploring Outcomes and Risk in Patients With Rare Central Nervous System Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03251989 completednot on this map

Exploring Outcomes and Risk in Patients With Rare Central Nervous System Tumors

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2017 to 2025Enrolled326ConditionsHigh Grade Meningioma, Ependymoma, Medulloblastoma, PNET
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ependymomas in Children and Adults.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Recent Advances in the Classification and Treatment of Ependymomas.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alvina A AcquayeUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth VeraUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Mark R GilbertNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Terri S ArmstrongUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Brain Tumor Clinical and Clinical Research Program (Clinical Support Services)ZIDBC011642 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI OZER, BYRAM · 2015 to 2025
$23.4M
Rare Central Nervous System Cancers InitiativeZIABC011643 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GILBERT, MARK · 2015 to 2024
$4.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes projects can be a catalyst for determining disease- and treatment-related consequences for patients with rare tumors. The Adult Ependymoma Outcomes (AEO) survey uses self-reported experience to evaluate how this tumor affects patient groups throughout the illness trajectory.

methodsPatients completed the AEO survey via a Web-based portal. The survey included questions on treatment, tumor recurrence, and current health status; the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor and Spine Tumor modules; and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

resultsThe sample included 264 participants (57% female) with a median age of 46 years (range, 18-77 years). Radiation treatment was commonly used for patients who had brain involvement (χ

conclusionsThese results demonstrate the feasibility of implementing outcomes projects that report on the clinical and demographic characteristics of a rare patient population, and they underscore the importance of outcomes data in understanding disease-related issues. Cancer 2017;123:494-501. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsEpendymomaFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeSpinal Cord NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcancer treatmentcentral nervous systemependymomaquality of lifesymptoms

Identifiers

PMID27679985
PMCPMC7886181
OpenAlexW2526181768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.