ArticleInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2016
Analysis of ovarian reserve markers (AMH, FSH, AFC) in different age strata in IVF/ICSI patients.
Article in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- An in silico model using prognostic genetic factors for ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating the role of follicular output rate in clinical and embryological outcomes in IVF: a prospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Association of Serum Phoenixin-14 and Phoenixin-20 with Diminished Ovarian Reserve.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting the optimal timing for triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation: mature oocytes retrieval predictor.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Impact of COVID-19 on Ovarian Function and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Reproductive Health in Women with Major β-Thalassemia: Evaluating Ovarian Reserve and Endocrine Complications.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Effects and safety of propofol intravenous anesthesia in transvaginal oocyte retrieval on outcomes ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Predicting the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with machine learning.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- The Polymorphism Asn680Ser on the FSH Receptor and Abnormal Ovarian Response in Patients with Normal Values of AMH and AFC.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Predictive Levels of Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone and the Combined Index of the Number of Retrieved Oocytes and Good-Quality Embryos in Advanced-Age Infertile Women.International journal of endocrinology · 2022Article
- High anti-Müllerian hormone levels might not reflect the likelihood of clinical pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI treatment.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2021Article
- FSH versus AMH: age-related relevance to ICSI results.Middle East Fertility Society journal · 2021Article
- Anti-Müllerian hormone is correlated with cumulative live birth in minimal ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Effect of Maternal Age on Hippo Pathway Related Gene Expressions and Protein Localization Pattern in Human Embryos.Cell journal · 2020Article
- The Disordered Vaginal Microbiota Is a Potential Indicator for a Higher Failure ofFrontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Age-Specific Distribution of Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Antral Follicle Count in Indian Infertile Women.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
- Ovarian reserve parameters and response to controlled ovarian stimulation in infertile patients.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe predictive roles of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) as ovarian reserve markers in women with different age groups are not established well.
objectiveThis study compares the value of FSH, AMH and AFC at the time of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in different age groups. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 103 women aged 20-43 years candidates for IVF/ICSI cycle were recruited. FSH, AMH and AFC on day 3 of menstrual cycle were measured. The relationship of these measured markers with outcome variables (oocytes number, number of frozen/fresh embryo and chemical and clinical pregnancy) was assessed in different age groups (i.e. 20-32, 33-37 and 38-43 years).
resultsour results show that age was correlated with clinical pregnancy, oocyte count and fresh and frozen embryo (p<0.001). AMH, AFC and FSH were not correlated with clinical or chemical pregnancy at total population or age subgroups except the significant correlation of AFC with clinical pregnancy at 33-37 years old group. AFC was correlated with oocyte count and the number of fresh and frozen embryos in the ages group 20-32 years. In this age group, AMH was correlated with fresh and frozen embryos. AMH, AFC and FSH were correlated with oocyte count and the number of fresh embryos in age group 33-37 years. AMH was correlated with oocyte count and the number of fresh embryos in 38-43 years old group.
conclusionWe concluded that the age is the superior predictor of IVF outcome and AMH and AFC are variable predicting markers of ovarian reserve in different age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27679824PMC5015663W2530692582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.