Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27679670›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics & chromatin2016

Nucleosome distortion as a possible mechanism of transcription activation domain function.

Tamara Y Erkina, Alexandre M Erkine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Commonly asked questions about transcriptional activation domains.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Order Through Disorder: The Characteristic Variability of Systems.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tamara Y ErkinaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN 46208 USA.
Alexandre M ErkineDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN 46208 USA.

Funding

Selective Inhibitors of Human HSF2R03MH097538 · NIMH · BUTLER UNIVERSITY · PI ERKINE, ALEXANDRE M. · 2012 to 2013
$59k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH097538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After more than three decades since the discovery of transcription activation domains (ADs) in gene-specific activators, the mechanism of their function remains enigmatic. The widely accepted model of direct recruitment by ADs of co-activators and basal transcriptional machinery components, however, is not always compatible with the short size yet very high degree of sequence randomness and intrinsic structural disorder of natural and synthetic ADs. In this review, we formulate the basis for an alternative and complementary model, whereby sequence randomness and intrinsic structural disorder of ADs are necessary for transient distorting interactions with promoter nucleosomes, triggering promoter nucleosome translocation and subsequently gene activation.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin remodelingIntrinsically disordered regionTranscriptional activation domainTranscription regulation

Identifiers

PMID27679670
PMCPMC5029090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.