Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27679566›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Prolonged Effects of Acute Stress on Decision-Making under Risk: A Human Psychophysiological Study.

Kaori Yamakawa, Hideki Ohira, Masahiro Matsunaga, Tokiko Isowa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kaori YamakawaDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya UniversityNagoya, Japan; Department of Psychology, School of Humanities, Tokaigakuen UniversityNagoya, Japan.
Hideki OhiraDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Masahiro MatsunagaDepartment of Health and Psychosocial Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine Nagakute, Japan.
Tokiko IsowaDepartment of Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University Tsu, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPAichi Medical University · JPMie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the prolonged effects of physiological responses induced by acute stress on risk-taking in decision-making. Participants were divided into a Stress group (N = 14) and a Control group (N = 12). The Trier Social Stress Test was administered as an acute stressor, and reading was administered as a control task; thereafter, participants performed a decision-making task in which they needed to choose a sure option or a gamble option in Gain and Loss frame trials 2 h after (non-) exposure to the stressor. Increased cortisol, adrenaline, heart rate (HR), and subjective stress levels validated acute stress manipulation. Stressed participants made fewer risky choices only in the Gain domain, whereas no effect of stress was shown in the Loss domain. Deceleration of HR reflecting attention was greater for Gains compared with Losses only in the Stress group. Risk avoidance was determined by increased levels of cortisol caused by acute stress. These results suggest that processes regarding glucocorticoid might be involved in the prolonged effects of acute stress on the evaluation of risks and the monitoring of outcomes in decision-making.

Indexed as

acute stresscortisoldecision-makingreflection effectrisk

Identifiers

PMID27679566
PMCPMC5020085
OpenAlexW2519856657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.