ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016
A Novel Function of δ Factor from Bacillus subtilis as a Transcriptional Repressor.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isolation of Persister Cells ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Evidence of Robustness in a Two-Component System Using a Synthetic Circuit.Journal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- In-Culture Cross-Linking of Bacterial Cells Reveals Large-Scale Dynamic Protein-Protein Interactions at the Peptide Level.Journal of proteome research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
δ, a small protein found in most Gram-positive bacteria was, for a long time, thought to be a subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) and was shown to be involved in recycling of RNAP at the end of each round of transcription. However, how δ participates in both up-regulation and down-regulation of genes in vivo remains unclear. We have recently shown, in addition to the recycling of RNAP, δ functions as a transcriptional activator by binding to an A-rich sequence located immediately upstream of the -35 element, consequently facilitating the open complex formation. The result had explained the mechanism of up-regulation of the genes by δ. Here, we show that Bacillus subtilis δ could also function as a transcriptional repressor. Our results demonstrate that δ binds to an A-rich sequence located near the -35 element of the spo0B promoter, the gene involved in the regulatory cascade of bacterial sporulation and inhibits the open complex formation due to steric clash with σ region 4.2. We observed a significant increase in the mRNA level of the spo0B gene in a δ-knock-out strain of B. subtilis compared with the wild-type. Thus, the results report a novel function of δ, and suggest the mechanism of down-regulation of genes in vivo by the protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.