Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27678530›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Early real-world evidence of persistence on oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cohort study in UK primary care.

Michelle E Johnson, Cinira Lefèvre, Shuk-Li Collings, David Evans, Sebastian Kloss, Essra Ridha, Andrew Maguire

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02488421 (Real Evidence of Anticoagulation Treatment in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Germany, UK and France), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02488421 completednot on this map

Real Evidence of Anticoagulation Treatment in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Germany, UK and France: REACT-AF 2

TypeobservationalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2014 to 2016Enrolled38,122ConditionsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. How much does elective cardioversion increase the risk of ischaemic stroke compared to the baseline risk in atrial fibrillation? A nationwide study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications after elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle E JohnsonOXON Epidemiology, London, UK.
Cinira LefèvreDepartment of Worldwide Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Paris, France.
Shuk-Li CollingsOXON Epidemiology, London, UK.
David EvansDepartment of Worldwide Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Paris, France.
Sebastian KlossPfizer, Berlin, Germany.
Essra RidhaMedical Department UK, Bristol-Myers Squibb, London, UK.
Andrew MaguireOXON Epidemiology, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the characteristics and persistence in patients newly initiated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

designCohort study in Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

settingUK primary care.

participants15 242 patients with NVAF newly prescribed apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) between 1 December 2012 and 31 October 2014. 13 089 patients were OAC naïve. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics and risk of non-persistence compared to apixaban using Cox regression models over the entire follow-up and using a time-partitioned approach to handle non-proportional hazards.

resultsAmong the OAC naïve patients, VKAs were most common (78.1%, n=10 218), followed by rivaroxaban (12.1%, n=1589), dabigatran (5.7%, n=741) and apixaban (4.1%, n=541). High baseline stroke risk (CHA

conclusionsObserved differential prescribing of OACs can result in channelling bias in comparative effectiveness research. Persistence patterns changed over follow-up time, but there are indications of improved persistence rates with apixaban over other OACs in the UK. A larger study with longer follow-up is needed to corroborate findings. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02488421).

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationdiscontinuation patternsoral anticoagulation

Identifiers

PMID27678530
PMCPMC5051466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.