Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27678506›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2016

Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis and Chronic Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting.

John M Wo, Thomas V Nowak, Shamaila Waseem, Matthew P Ward

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John M WoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, GI Motility and Neurogastroenterology Unit, Indiana University Hospital, Room 1634, 550 University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. jmwo@iu.edu.
Thomas V NowakDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, GI Motility and Neurogastroenterology Unit, Indiana University Hospital, Room 1634, 550 University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Shamaila WaseemDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Riley Children Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Matthew P WardCenter of Implantable Devices, Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USRiley Hospital for Children · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementGastroparesis is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome. Some patients have debilitating vomiting, weight loss, and dehydration, while others have effortless regurgitation of undigested foods or postprandial distress suggestive of functional dyspepsia. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been proposed as an effective treatment option for patients with gastroparesis refractory to medical therapy. Evidence suggests that the clinically available device, a low-energy high-frequency GES, activates the vagal afferent pathways to influence the central control mechanisms for nausea and vomiting. Myoelectrical effects of the stomach are also involved. The results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for adults with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis are conflicting. There are no RCTs in adults with chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting (CUNV) with normal gastric emptying or in children with gastroparesis. However, there is increasing evidence from large unblinded studies showing the long-term efficacy in selected adults with gastroparesis. Selection criteria should be based on three categories: (a) underlying etiology, (b) clinical presentation and predominant symptoms, and (c) potential risk for complication. Significant abdominal pain, daily opiate use, and idiopathic gastroparesis are identified as negative predictors of success. Temporary GES has been utilized to identify patients who may benefit from surgical GES, but this strategy has yet to be proven in controlled studies. Objectives for this review are to highlight the mechanisms of action for GES, to look at the evidence for clinical efficacy, and to select patients who are likely to benefit.

Indexed as

Chronic unexplained nausea and vomitingGastric electrical stimulationGastroparesisNauseaNeurostimulationVomiting

Identifiers

PMID27678506
OpenAlexW2526451767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.