ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2016
Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis and Chronic Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural Gastric Electrical Stimulation: Future Prospects in Managing Gastric Emptying Disorders.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Diabetic impact on the neuroaxis: from peripheral neuropathy to central neurodegeneration.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Gastroparesis, a diabetic complication causing further, even serious, complications: How to prevent its worsening?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Gastric electrical stimulation versus standard medical therapies for long-term symptom control and improved quality of life in drug-refractory gastroparesis patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Bioinspired, ingestible electroceutical capsules for hunger-regulating hormone modulation.Science robotics · 2023Article
- Electroceuticals for Neurogastroenterology and Motility Disorders.Current gastroenterology reports · 2023Review
- Neural signalling of gut mechanosensation in ingestive and digestive processes.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- A Systematic Review of the Therapeutic Role of Gastric Pacemakers in Adults With Gastroparesis.Cureus · 2021Review
- Article
- Gastric Electrical Stimulators Causing Erosion Through the Colonic Wall.ACG case reports journal · 2020Article
- Review
- Distributions and relationships of chemically defined enteroendocrine cells in the rat gastric mucosa.Cell and tissue research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementGastroparesis is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome. Some patients have debilitating vomiting, weight loss, and dehydration, while others have effortless regurgitation of undigested foods or postprandial distress suggestive of functional dyspepsia. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been proposed as an effective treatment option for patients with gastroparesis refractory to medical therapy. Evidence suggests that the clinically available device, a low-energy high-frequency GES, activates the vagal afferent pathways to influence the central control mechanisms for nausea and vomiting. Myoelectrical effects of the stomach are also involved. The results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for adults with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis are conflicting. There are no RCTs in adults with chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting (CUNV) with normal gastric emptying or in children with gastroparesis. However, there is increasing evidence from large unblinded studies showing the long-term efficacy in selected adults with gastroparesis. Selection criteria should be based on three categories: (a) underlying etiology, (b) clinical presentation and predominant symptoms, and (c) potential risk for complication. Significant abdominal pain, daily opiate use, and idiopathic gastroparesis are identified as negative predictors of success. Temporary GES has been utilized to identify patients who may benefit from surgical GES, but this strategy has yet to be proven in controlled studies. Objectives for this review are to highlight the mechanisms of action for GES, to look at the evidence for clinical efficacy, and to select patients who are likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.