Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27678367›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Double-layered covered stent for the treatment of malignant oesophageal obstructions: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zeiad Hussain, Athanasios Diamantopoulos, Miltiadis Krokidis, Konstantinos Katsanos

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Endoscopic Treatments in Perforation or Fistula in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeiad HussainZeiad Hussain, Athanasios Diamantopoulos, Konstantinos Katsanos, Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Athanasios DiamantopoulosZeiad Hussain, Athanasios Diamantopoulos, Konstantinos Katsanos, Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Miltiadis KrokidisZeiad Hussain, Athanasios Diamantopoulos, Konstantinos Katsanos, Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Konstantinos KatsanosZeiad Hussain, Athanasios Diamantopoulos, Konstantinos Katsanos, Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Society of Interventional Radiology · USSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the efficacy of double-layered covered stent in the treatment of malignant oesophageal obstructions.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA process. PubMed (Medline), EMBASE (Excerpta Medical Database), AMED (Allied and Complementary medicine Database), Scopus and online content, were searched for studies reporting on the NiTi-S polyurethane-covered double oesophageal stent for the treatment of malignant dysphagia. Weighted pooled outcomes were synthesized with a random effects model to account for clinical heterogeneity. All studies reporting the outcome of palliative management of dysphagia due to histologically confirmed malignant oesophageal obstruction using double-layered covered nitinol stent were included. The level of statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

resultsSix clinical studies comprising 250 patients in total were identified. Pooled technical success of stent insertion was 97.2% (95%CI: 94.8%-98.9%; I (2) = 5.8%). Pooled complication rate was 27.6% (95%CI: 20.7%-35.2%; I (2) = 41.9%). Weighted improvement of dysphagia on a scale of 0-5 scoring system was -2.00 [95%CI: -2.29%-(-1.72%); I (2) = 87%]. Distal stent migration was documented in 10 out of the 250 cases examined. Pooled stent migration rate was 4.7% (95%CI: 2.5%-7.7%; I (2) = 0%). Finally, tumour overgrowth was reported in 34 out of the 250 cases with pooled rate of tumour overgrowth of 11.2% (95%CI: 3.7%-22.1%; I (2) = 82.2%). No funnel plot asymmetry to suggest publication bias (bias = 0.39, P = 0.78). In the sensitivity analysis all results were largely similar between the fixed and random effects models.

conclusionThe double-layered nitinol stent provides immediate relief of malignant dysphagia with low rates of stent migration and tumour overgrowth.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlloysDeglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStatistics as TopicStentsTreatment OutcomeAlloysnitinolDouble-layered covered stentDouble-layered nitinol stentDysphagiaMalignant oesophageal obstructions

Identifiers

PMID27678367
PMCPMC5016384
OpenAlexW2514808561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.