Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27678329›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2016

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin eluted from a regenerating bone graft substitute: In vitro and clinical release studies.

M Stravinskas, P Horstmann, J Ferguson, W Hettwer, M Nilsson, S Tarasevicius, M M Petersen, M A McNally, L Lidgren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Short or Long Antibiotic Regimens in Orthopedics.The New England journal of medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CaO-SiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial-loaded cements and beads in orthopedic trauma and arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Review of Phage Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

M StravinskasOrthopaedic Surgeon, Lithuanian University of Health, Eivenių str. 2, LT-50009 Kaunas, Lithuania.
P HorstmannMusculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
J FergusonThe Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7HE, UK.
W HettwerMusculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
M NilssonDepartment of Orthopedics, Lund University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden malin@lalit.se.
S TaraseviciusOrthopaedic Surgeon, Lithuanian University of Health, Eivenių str. 2, LT-50009 Kaunas, Lithuania.
M M PetersenMusculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
M A McNallyThe Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7HE, UK.
L LidgrenDepartment of Orthopedics, Lund University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Rigshospitalet · DKLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTLund University · SENuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeep bone and joint infections (DBJI) are directly intertwined with health, demographic change towards an elderly population, and wellbeing.The elderly human population is more prone to acquire infections, and the consequences such as pain, reduced quality of life, morbidity, absence from work and premature retirement due to disability place significant burdens on already strained healthcare systems and societal budgets.DBJIs are less responsive to systemic antibiotics because of poor vascular perfusion in necrotic bone, large bone defects and persistent biofilm-based infection. Emerging bacterial resistance poses a major threat and new innovative treatment modalities are urgently needed to curb its current trajectory. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe present a new biphasic ceramic bone substitute consisting of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate for local antibiotic delivery in combination with bone regeneration. Gentamicin release was measured in four setups: 1) in vitro elution in Ringer's solution; 2) local elution in patients treated for trochanteric hip fractures or uncemented hip revisions; 3) local elution in patients treated with a bone tumour resection; and 4) local elution in patients treated surgically for chronic corticomedullary osteomyelitis.

resultsThe release pattern in vitro was comparable with the obtained release in the patient studies. No recurrence was detected in the osteomyelitis group at latest follow-up (minimum 1.5 years).

conclusionsThis new biphasic bone substitute containing antibiotics provides safe prevention of bone infections in a range of clinical situations. The in vitro test method predicts the in vivo performance and makes it a reliable tool in the development of future antibiotic-eluting bone-regenerating materials.Cite this article: M. Stravinskas, P. Horstmann, J. Ferguson, W. Hettwer, M. Nilsson, S. Tarasevicius, M. M. Petersen, M. A. McNally, L. Lidgren. Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin eluted from a regenerating bone graft substitute: In vitro and clinical release studies. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:427-435. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0108.R1.

Indexed as

AntibioticsBone graft substituteGentamicinInfectionPrevention

Identifiers

PMID27678329
PMCPMC5047051
OpenAlexW2525938729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.