Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27678210›Full record

ArticleFunctional neurology

Robot-assisted gait training versus treadmill training in patients with Parkinson's disease: a kinematic evaluation with gait profile score.

M Galli, V Cimolin, M F De Pandis, D Le Pera, I Sova, G Albertini, F Stocchi, M Franceschini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Functional neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04778852 (Quantitative Assessment of Training Effects Using a Wearable Exoskeleton in Parkinson Disease Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04778852 naunknown statusnot on this map

Quantitative Assessment of Training Effects Using a Wearable Exoskeleton in Parkinson Disease Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PadovaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsExperimental: EksoGT, Functional kinematic training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M Galli
V Cimolin
M F De Pandis
D Le Pera
I Sova
G Albertini
F Stocchi
M Franceschini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the effects, on walking performance, of end-effector robotic rehabilitation locomotor training versus intensive training with a treadmill in Parkinson's disease (PD). Fifty patients with PD were randomly divided into two groups: 25 were assigned to the robot-assisted therapy group (RG) and 25 to the intensive treadmill therapy group (IG). They were evaluated with clinical examination and 3D quantitative gait analysis [gait profile score (GPS) and its constituent gait variable scores (GVSs) were calculated from gait analysis data] at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T1) of the treatment. In the RG no differences were found in the GPS, but there were significant improvements in some GVSs (Pelvic Obl and Hip Ab-Add). The IG showed no statistically significant changes in either GPS or GVSs. The end-effector robotic rehabilitation locomotor training improved gait kinematics and seems to be effective for rehabilitation in patients with mild PD.

Indexed as

AgedBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TherapyFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseRoboticsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeWalking

Identifiers

PMID27678210
PMCPMC5115231
OpenAlexW2504557640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.