Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27678143›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017

Validation of the International Urogynecology Association's Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire in Arabic.

Ahmed Al-Badr, Rafeef Al-Juraifani, Ghadeer Al-Sheikh, Hazem Al-Mandeel, Lateefa Al-Dakhyel, Nadeen Al-Shahrani

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient-reported outcome measures in Arabic-speaking populations: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed Al-BadrDepartment of Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Women's Specialized Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. aalbadr@kfmc.med.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-6014
Rafeef Al-JuraifaniRehabilitation Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadeer Al-SheikhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Saud University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hazem Al-MandeelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Saud University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lateefa Al-DakhyelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Saud University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nadeen Al-ShahraniRehabilitation Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Fahd Medical City · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisA valid and reliable Arabic version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR) is needed.

methodsOf 238 Saudi Arabian women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 227 were recruited. A detailed history was obtained and pelvic examination was performed in all participants. An Arabic version of the PISQ-IR was administered with three quality of life measures. Reliability was assessed by factor analysis, and internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's α. Face validity was established with translation, back-translation, and cognitive reviews. Criterion validity was determined by analysing the correlations between the responses and the clinical examinations and by comparing the responses with those to other validated measures of incontinence and prolapse.

resultsOverall, 67 % of the women were categorized as sexually active and 33 % as sexually inactive. The overall frequency of urinary incontinence was highest (85.5 %), followed by prolapse (59 %) and fecal incontinence (53.3 %). The average score in the factor analysis for dimensions of sexual inactivity was 2.7 and Cronbach's α was 0.61; an item-by-item assessment of the majority of the scales showed an α value of >0.75, suggesting a moderate-to-high internal consistency. Regarding external validity, strong negative correlations were found with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI), and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in the sexually active group, and positive correlations were found with the CRADI and PFIQ in the sexually inactive group.

conclusionsThe Arabic version of the PISQ-IR is reliable and valid for assessing sexual function in Arabic-speaking women with pelvic floor disorders.

Indexed as

TranslationsAdultFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansLanguageMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSaudi ArabiaSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary IncontinenceArabicIncontinencePelvic floorPelvic organ prolapseQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID27678143
OpenAlexW2524341329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.