ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Combined use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-acting agents: a cross-sectional study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Associated Factors Among Older Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome at Hospital Discharge in Beijing, China.Clinical interventions in aging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Due to recent EU warnings and restrictions on the combined use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS)-acting agents, and the seriousness of the associated harm, we analyzed the prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as dual therapy or associated with spironolactone. Setting An administrative claims database of a regional hospital in Romania. Methods We retrospectively included all adult patients hospitalized during 18 months in 2013-2014, discharged with a prescription of a RAAS-acting agent. Main outcome measures Counts of ACEIs and ARBs co-prescription, of ACEIs or ARBs combined with spironolactone, co-morbidities, co-medication, creatinine, and electrolytes assessment and values. Results Out of 1697 patients with a prescription of a RAAS-acting agent, 24 (1.4 %) were co-prescribed ACEIs and ARBs, and 416 (24.5 %) ACEIs or ARBs with spironolactone. Patients prescribed dual ACEI/ARB therapy and the ones with ACEI or ARB-spironolactone combination had significantly higher prevalence of increased creatinine level before discharge, compared to the ACEI and ARB monotherapy groups (48 and 31 % compared to 17 and 27 %). Subjects with diabetes, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, or urea ≥40 mg/dL had higher odds of having ACEI or ARB-spironolactone combination compared to monotherapy, while hypertension and renal disease subjects had lower odds. Similar findings were comparing dual ACEI/ARB therapy to monotherapy except heart failure (not statistically significant). Conclusion Overall, the prevalence of use of dual therapy was low. The combined use of RAAS-acting agents was higher in patients with known risk factors for further renal function deterioration, compared to the ones without.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.