ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Less pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center pooled analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- [Clinical value of alternative technologies to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy - single port, reduced port, robotics, NOTES].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- MIEO: a micro-invasive endoscopic operation port system for transluminal interventions-an acute and survival porcine study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe previously reported outcome after transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) from two cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial. We now present a pooled analysis of postoperative pain scores.
designSingle-center data of postoperative pain after TVC from a level II hospital between October 2007 and June 2012.
methodsFemale patients, above 18 years with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, received either TVC or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Follow up 4 days. The primary outcome of the study was pain after surgery. Pain was measured via a visual rating scale. Descriptive statistics include age, body mass index (BMI), ASA grade, surgical times, number of trocars, complications and hospital stay as well as pain medication. Pain data were assessed against histologic findings.
resultsThe combined register included 316 patients. Of these, 7 patients were excluded from analysis due to conversion to open surgery, complications and denial of follow-up. There were 141 patients in the TVC and 168 in the CLC group. There was no difference in age, ASA grade, surgical times, complications or hospital stay. BMI was significantly different with an average BMI of 27.1 in the TVC and 28.7 in the CLC group (p = 0.027). The numbers of trocars were significantly different as expected. There was no difference in postoperative pain medication. Pain scores were significantly different on day two to four. Multivariate testing revealed no dependence between postoperative pain and histologic findings.
conclusionOn smaller patient numbers, we were previously unable to demonstrate a consistently, significant difference for postoperative pain in our cohort and randomized studies. The pooled analysis suggests that there is an advantage with less postoperative pain after transvaginal compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.