Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27677814›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2016

Food limitation constrains host immune responses to nematode infections.

Kristian M Forbes, Tapio Mappes, Tarja Sironen, Tomas Strandin, Peter Stuart, Seppo Meri, Olli Vapalahti, Heikki Henttonen, Otso Huitu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Temporal dynamics in gastrointestinal helminth infections of sympatric mouse lemur species (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  16. Reviewing the effects of food provisioning on wildlife immunity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Livestock abundance predicts vampire bat demography, immune profiles and bacterial infection risk.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host-parasite dynamics in wildlife.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Food for contagion: synthesis and future directions for studying host-parasite responses to resource shifts in anthropogenic environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristian M ForbesDepartment of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland kristian.forbes@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-2707
Tapio MappesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Tarja SironenDepartment of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tomas StrandinDepartment of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Peter StuartDepartment of Zoology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Seppo MeriDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Immunobiology Reseach Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli VapalahtiDepartment of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Heikki HenttonenForest and Animal Ecology, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Vantaa, Finland.
Otso HuituForest and Animal Ecology, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Vantaa, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FINatural Resources Institute Finland · FITrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trade-offs in the allocation of finite-energy resources among immunological defences and other physiological processes are believed to influence infection risk and disease severity in food-limited wildlife populations. However, this prediction has received little experimental investigation. Here we test the hypothesis that food limitation impairs the ability of wild field voles (Microtus agrestis) to mount an immune response against parasite infections. We conducted a replicated experiment on vole populations maintained in large outdoor enclosures during boreal winter, using food supplementation and anthelmintic treatment of intestinal nematodes. Innate immune responses against intestinal parasite infections were compared between food-supplemented and non-supplemented voles. Voles with high food availability mounted stronger immune responses against intestinal nematode infections than food-limited voles. No food effects were seen in immune responses to intracellular coccidian parasites, possibly owing to their ability to avoid activation of innate immune pathways. Our findings demonstrate that food availability constrains vole immune responses against nematode infections, and support the concept that spatio-temporal heterogeneity in food availability creates variation in infectious disease susceptibility.

Indexed as

eco-immunologyfield experimentivermectinparasitevole

Identifiers

PMID27677814
PMCPMC5046926
OpenAlexW2524068182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.