Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27677672›Full record

ReviewJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2017

Neurobehavioral testing in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A review of methods and current findings in rodents.

Nefize Turan, Brandon A Miller, Robert A Heider, Maheen Nadeem, Iqbal Sayeed, Donald G Stein, Gustavo Pradilla

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rodent Models of Post-Stroke Dementia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Haemoglobin causes neuronal damageBrain communications · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nefize Turan1 Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brandon A Miller1 Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert A Heider1 Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maheen Nadeem1 Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Iqbal Sayeed2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Donald G Stein2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gustavo Pradilla1 Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most important aspect of a preclinical study seeking to develop a novel therapy for neurological diseases is whether the therapy produces any clinically relevant functional recovery. For this purpose, neurobehavioral tests are commonly used to evaluate the neuroprotective efficacy of treatments in a wide array of cerebrovascular diseases and neurotrauma. Their use, however, has been limited in experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage studies. After several randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trials repeatedly failed to produce a benefit in functional outcome despite some improvement in angiographic vasospasm, more rigorous methods of neurobehavioral testing became critical to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the functional efficacy of proposed treatments. While several subarachnoid hemorrhage studies have incorporated an array of neurobehavioral assays, a standardized methodology has not been agreed upon. Here, we review neurobehavioral tests for rodents and their potential application to subarachnoid hemorrhage studies. Developing a standardized neurobehavioral testing regimen in rodent studies of subarachnoid hemorrhage would allow for better comparison of results between laboratories and a better prediction of what interventions would produce functional benefits in humans.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsCognition DisordersDisease Models, AnimalMiceRatsSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialAnimal modelsbehavior (rodent)cognitive impairmentexperimentalsubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID27677672
PMCPMC5669338
OpenAlexW2525321021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.