Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27677487›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2017

A Comparative Study Examining the Impact of a Protein-Enriched Vs Normal Protein Postoperative Diet on Body Composition and Resting Metabolic Rate in Obese Patients after Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Luigi Schiavo, Giuseppe Scalera, Vincenzo Pilone, Gabriele De Sena, Vincenzo Quagliariello, Antonio Iannelli, Alfonso Barbarisi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luigi SchiavoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Science, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy. luigi.schiavo@unina2.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-6847
Giuseppe ScaleraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Science, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo PiloneDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Gabriele De SenaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Science, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo QuagliarielloDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Science, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Antonio IannelliDigestive Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, 06202, Nice, France.
Alfonso BarbarisiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Science, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITInserm · FRUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe recently showed that an 8-week preoperative protein-enriched diet (PED) is associated with significant reductions in body weight and fat mass (FM) without significant loss of fat-free mass (FFM) in morbidly obese patients scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

objectivesThe objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of PED vs a normal protein diet (NPD) on total weight loss (TWL), FM, FFM, and resting metabolic rate (RMR) in patients after LSG.

methodsBefore LSG and at 3, 6, and 12 months after, we prospectively measured and compared total body weight (TBW), FM, FFM, and RMR in 60 male patients who received either a NPD (n = 30) with protein intake 1.0 g/kg of ideal body weight, or a PED (n = 30) with protein intake 2.0 g/kg of ideal body weight. Compliance in following the prescribed diet was determined with food frequency questionnaires in all patients. The impact of NPD and PED on renal function was also evaluated.

resultsDespite non-significant variation in total body weight (TBW), FM decreased more significantly (p < 0.01) with the PED compared to the NPD. In addition, the PED group showed a significantly (p < 0.01) lower decrease in FFM and RMR when compared with the NPD group. Both groups showed high compliance in following the prescribed diets, without negative impact on renal function.

conclusionPED is more effective than NPD in determining FM loss and is associated with a lower decrease in FFM and RMR, without interfering with renal function in male patients after LSG.

Indexed as

GastrectomyAdolescentAdultAgedBasal MetabolismBody CompositionCombined Modality TherapyDietary ProteinsFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative PeriodRestDietary ProteinsBody compositionFat-free massObesityProtein intakeSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID27677487
OpenAlexW2524175054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.