Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27677285›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2016

[Clinical aspects and diagnostics of cerebral vasculitis].

W Reith, C Kraus, N Harsch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Smouldering fire].Der Radiologe · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W ReithKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland. Wolfgang.Reith@uniklinikum-saarland.de.
C KrausKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
N HarschKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueVasculitis is a rare cause of diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). Vasculitis can be divided into primary and secondary forms, of which the vast majority can be manifested in various organ systems, including the CNS. Isolated vasculitis of the CNS is limited to the CNS and clinical neurological symptoms as with the other forms of vasculitis, are headaches, encephalopathy, focal deficits and seizures. A criterion of isolated CNS vasculitis is the clinical and laboratory diagnostic exclusion of other forms of vasculitis and the involvement of other organ systems. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsMultiple leaps in the caliber of intracranial arteries in cerebral angiography and multiple, small contrast medium-enhanced lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain are typical findings, which, however, can also be found in other forms of vasculitis. PERFORMANCE: The only way of proving meningitis is by a biopsy of the brain meninges and parenchyma. It is necessary to make as accurate a diagnosis as possible, especially in the context of therapeutic options of immunosuppression with steroids and cyclophosphamide. ACHIEVEMENTS: Cerebral vasculitis is a rare entity but it is an important diagnosis to consider when the appropriate clinical symptoms are present. Thorough laboratory diagnostics and subsequent brain biopsy are necessary to confirm the diagnosis in order to then be able to initiate a specific treatment.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyCerebrovascular DisordersDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyVasculitis, Central Nervous SystemBrain biopsyClinical laboratory techniquesCNS vasculitisDifferential diagnosisImaging

Identifiers

PMID27677285
OpenAlexW2524719988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.