ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016
How Patients View Lung Cancer Screening. The Role of Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making.
Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening uptake and intention to screen: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Pooled it
- Communication of Diagnostic Uncertainty in Primary Care and Its Impact on Patient Experience: an Integrative Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Psychological Impact of Ambiguous Health Messages about COVID-19.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Trial
- Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Racism, discrimination, medical mistrust, stigma, and lung cancer screening: a scoping review.Ethnicity & health · 2025Article
- Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening.Cancers · 2023Review
- Hospitalization as an opportunity to engage underserved individuals in shared decision-making for lung cancer screening: results from two randomized pilot trials.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
- Patient Experience of Managing Adherence to Repeat Lung Cancer Screening.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Article
- Promoting Clinical Conversations about Lung Cancer Screening: Exploring the Role of Perceived Online Social Support.Journal of health communication · 2020Article
- Development and Field Testing of a Long-Term Care Decision Aid Website for Older Adults: Engaging Patients and Caregivers in User-Centered Design.The Gerontologist · 2020Article
- Article
- Using Social Media as a Platform for Increasing Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening in High-Risk Patients.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2020Article
- Preferences for Predictive Model Characteristics among People Living with Chronic Lung Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020Article
- The impact of perceived risk, screening eligibility and worry on preference for lung cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey.ERJ open research · 2020Article
- Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019Article
- Defining the information needs of lung cancer screening participants: a qualitative study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2019Article
- The complicated 'Yes': Decision-making processes and receptivity to lung cancer screening among head and neck cancer survivors.Patient education and counseling · 2018Article
- Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
- Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleRadiographic lung cancer screening guidelines and coverage requirements warrant a shared decision-making process. Guidance is needed regarding how to conduct shared decision making effectively. A useful organizing theme should include consideration of a patient's response to and tolerance of uncertainty associated with lung cancer screening.
objectivesThe objectives of this study are to: (1) describe how patients respond to specific categories of uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening, and (2) inform strategies for addressing concerns about uncertainty as part of the shared decision making.
methodsWe performed two series of structured interviews on participants in a convenience sample of current or former cigarette smokers recruited from primary care and pulmonary practices in Philadelphia. An interview guide included prompts related to benefits, harms, and responses to general and specific types of uncertainty (stochastic, statistical, and evidentiary) associated with lung cancer screening. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by two investigators. An inductive analysis was conducted, and major themes were identified. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsTwenty-two adults participated in the study. Sixty-eight percent were men, 72% were black or African American, and 50% met U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening. The primary themes to emerge from our study were: (1) the desire to decrease uncertainty may motivate lung cancer screening decisions; (2) uncertainty is an attribute of health states that impacts how patients weigh benefits and harms of lung cancer screening; (3) patient understanding and tolerance of uncertainty varies across stochastic, statistical, and evidentiary uncertainty; and (4) provider-patient communication may mitigate intolerance of uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening.
conclusionsA systematic approach to understanding and addressing patients' concerns about uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening can guide a patient-centered approach to shared decision making. The results of this study can inform provider-patient communication strategies regarding the decision to perform radiographic lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.