ReviewCurrent biology : CB2016
Gene Flow and Molecular Innovation in Bacteria.
Review in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic characterization of horizontally transferred biosynthetic gene clusters in the human gut microbiota using HTBGC-Finder.iMetaOmics · 2025Article
- A multi-omics reciprocal analysis for characterization of bacterial metabolism.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- The Genomic-Driven Discovery of Glutarimide-Containing Derivatives fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Biosynthetic gene clusters and the evolution of fungal chemodiversity.Natural product reports · 2020Article
- Review
- Diversity and distribution of the bmp gene cluster and its Polybrominated products in the genus Pseudoalteromonas.Environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- A Novel Strategy for Detecting Recent Horizontal Gene Transfer and Its Application toFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Constraints on lateral gene transfer in promoting fimbrial usher protein diversity and function.Open biology · 2017Article
- Meeting Proceedings, 2017 Cornell University Baker Symposium-Quo Vadis: The Boundless Trajectories of Chemical Biology.Biochemistry · 2017Article
- Quorum Sensing in a Methane-Oxidizing Bacterium.Journal of bacteriology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The small molecules produced by environmental bacteria have been mainstays of both chemical and biological research for decades, and some have led to important therapeutic interventions. These small molecules have been shaped by natural selection as they evolved to fulfill changing functional roles in their native environments. This minireview describes some recent systematic studies providing illustrative examples that involve the acquisition and alteration of genetic information for molecular innovation by bacteria in well-defined environments. Two different bacterial genera are featured, Pseudonocardia and Salinispora, and, although the small-molecule repertoires of both have benefited from horizontal gene transfer, Pseudonocardia spp. have relied on plasmid-based tactics while Salinispora spp. have relied on chromosomally integrated genomic islands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.