Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27676259›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016

Economic Feasibility of Staffing the Intensive Care Unit with a Communication Facilitator.

Nita Khandelwal, David Benkeser, Norma B Coe, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation and Analysis of the European Quality Questionnaire in Italian Language.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nita Khandelwal1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and.
David Benkeser2 Department of Biostatistics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Norma B Coe3 Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.
Ruth A Engelberg4 Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, and.
J Randall Curtis4 Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, and.

Funding

Randomized trial of an interdisciplinary communication intervention to improve paR01NR005226 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURTIS, J RANDALL, ENGELBERG, RUTH ANN · 1999 to 2012
$6.7M
Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine Training GrantT32GM086270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tonya M Palermo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086270NINR NIH HHS R01 NR005226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIn the intensive care unit (ICU), complex decision making by clinicians and families requires good communication to ensure that care is consistent with the patients' values and goals.

objectivesTo assess the economic feasibility of staffing ICUs with a communication facilitator.

methodsData were from a randomized trial of an "ICU communication facilitator" linked to hospital financial records; eligible patients (n = 135) were admitted to the ICU at a single hospital with predicted mortality ≥30% and a surrogate decision maker. Adjusted regression analyses assessed differences in ICU total and direct variable costs between intervention and control patients. A bootstrap-based simulation assessed the cost efficiency of a facilitator while varying the full-time equivalent of the facilitator and the ICU mortality risk. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsTotal ICU costs (mean 22.8k; 95% CI, -42.0k to -3.6k; P = 0.02) and average daily ICU costs (mean, -0.38k; 95% CI, -0.65k to -0.11k; P = 0.006)] were reduced significantly with the intervention. Despite more contacts, families of survivors spent less time per encounter with facilitators than did families of decedents (mean, 25 [SD, 11] min vs. 36 [SD, 14] min). Simulation demonstrated maximal weekly savings with a 1.0 full-time equivalent facilitator and a predicted ICU mortality of 15% (total weekly ICU cost savings, $58.4k [95% CI, $57.7k-59.2k]; weekly direct variable savings, $5.7k [95% CI, $5.5k-5.8k]) after incorporating facilitator costs.

conclusionsAdding a full-time trained communication facilitator in the ICU may improve the quality of care while simultaneously reducing short-term (direct variable) and long-term (total) health care costs. This intervention is likely to be more cost effective in a lower-mortality population.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedCost SavingsCritical CareDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital CostsHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPalliative Carecommunicationcritical careintensive care unit costspalliative care

Identifiers

PMID27676259
PMCPMC5291499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.