Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27676193›Full record

ArticleJournal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery2017

Inhaler Technique in Asthma: How Does It Relate to Patients' Preferences and Attitudes Toward Their Inhalers?

Lia Jahedi, Sue R Downie, Bandana Saini, Hak-Kim Chan, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05664347 (Video-based Teach-to-goal Intervention on Inhaler Technique on Adults With Asthma and COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05664347 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Video-based Teach-to-goal Intervention on Inhaler Technique on Adults With Asthma and COPD: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of JordanRan2020 to 2021Enrolled154ConditionsCOPD, Asthma, Inhaled Steroid Dependent AsthmaArmsVerbal teach to goal education, Video based teach to goal education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Real-World Use of Inhaled COPD Medications: the Good, the Bad, the Ugly.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical inertia in asthma.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Inhaler Technique Questionnaire (InTeQ): Development and Validation of a Brief Patient-Reported Measure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lia Jahedi1 Woolcock Institute of Medical Research , Glebe, Australia .
Sue R Downie1 Woolcock Institute of Medical Research , Glebe, Australia .
Bandana Saini2 Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia .
Hak-Kim Chan2 Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia .
Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich1 Woolcock Institute of Medical Research , Glebe, Australia .
University of Sydney · AUSydney Local Health District · AUWoolcock Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrect inhaler technique can increase medication efficacy, reducing both dose and side effects. Patient preference for inhaler device has not been fully explored, and we hypothesized that if patients have a preference and can choose their inhaler, they might be more likely to use it correctly. Our aim was to determine the preferences, attitudes, and perceptions of patients with asthma toward their inhalers, and to evaluate whether any of these factors were related to inhalation technique.

methodsTwenty-five patients with asthma (mean age 43.1 years) participated. Qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitative patient satisfaction and preference questionnaires (PASAPQ) were used to explore patients' preferences, attitudes, and perceptions about their inhalers. Objective inhalation technique assessment was performed. Data were triangulated to identify characteristics that could indicate a relationship between inhaler technique, satisfaction, preference, and decision making.

resultsThemes from qualitative interviews were as follows: asthma inhalers and expectations; inhaler preference; characteristics of an ideal inhaler; perceived effectiveness of inhalers; and inhalers and patient decision making. PASAPQ scores indicated that all patients were at least "somewhat satisfied" with their inhalers, regardless of technique. Only 12% of inhalers were used correctly, despite pilot PASAPQ data suggesting that most patients were confident with their technique. The inhaler technique was unlikely to be related to satisfaction, perception of inhaler devices, or choice in device selection. Patients with correct inhaler technique were more aware of their asthma and expressed motivation to achieve optimal asthma control.

conclusionsThe majority of the asthmatic patients did not use their inhaler(s) correctly, despite most having confidence in their technique. Patients attributed confidence in their inhaler technique to their belief that their inhaler was effective. Most patients had not been involved in decision making about which inhalation device to use. These findings highlight the lack of understanding of the important role of correct inhaler technique in asthma management.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient PreferenceAdministration, InhalationAdultAgedAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaDecision MakingEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsAnti-Asthmatic Agentsasthmainhaler techniquepatient preferenceperception

Identifiers

PMID27676193
PMCPMC5278803
OpenAlexW2524732220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.