Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27676093›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2017

A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial.

Ulas E Akbulut, Sedat Saylan, Bilal Sengu, Gulgun E Akcali, Engin Erturk, Murat Cakir

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Up-to-date literature review and issues of sedation during digestive endoscopy.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Endo-anesthesia: a primer.Gastroenterology report · 2022
    Review
  12. PropofolJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Recent Developments in Drugs for GI Endoscopy Sedation.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulas E AkbulutDepartments of aPediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition bAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kanuni Training and Research Hospital Departments of cAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine dPediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Sedat Saylan
Bilal Sengu
Gulgun E Akcali
Engin Erturk
Murat Cakir
Karadeniz Technical University · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of midazolam plus ketamine versus fentanyl plus propofol combination administered to children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) and to determine the most appropriate sedation protocol. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective, randomized, single-blind study included patients between the ages of 4 and 17 years who underwent UGE for diagnostic purposes. Patients were divided randomly into groups A (midazolam-ketamine combination, n=119) and B (fentanyl plus propofol combination, n=119). The effectiveness of the sedation and complications during the procedure and recovery period were recorded.

resultsThe processes started without an additional dose of the drug for 118 patients (99.1%) in group A and for 101 patients (84.8%) in group B (P=0.001). The average dose of ketamine administered to the patients in group A was 1.03±0.15 mg/kg and the average dose of propofol administered to the patients in group B was 1.46±0.55 mg/kg. None of the patients stopped the endoscopic procedure in group A, but one patient (0.8%) had to discontinue the endoscopic procedure in group B. 27 patients in group A (22.7%) and 41 patients (34.5%) in group B developed complications during the procedure (P=0.044). The rate of complications during the recovery of group A (110 patients, 92.4%) was significantly higher than that in group B (48 patients, 40.3%) (P=0.001).

conclusionIn children, UGE procedures can be quite comfortable when using the midazolam-ketamine combination. However, adverse effects related to ketamine were observed during recovery.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalAdolescentAge FactorsChildConsciousnessDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleFentanylHumansHypnotics and SedativesKetamineMaleMidazolamPropofolProspective StudiesDrug CombinationsFentanylHypnotics and SedativesKetamineMidazolamPropofol

Identifiers

PMID27676093
PMCPMC5134819
OpenAlexW2527232994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.