ReviewIntractable & rare diseases research2016
Urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells as a modeling tool to study rare human diseases.
Review in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generation and characterization of induced pluripotent stem cells from a patient with classic Fabry disease.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Article
- Understanding the Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity Employing hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocyte Models for Drug Screening and the Identification of Genetic and Epigenetic Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Urine-derived stem cells: a sustainable resource for advancing personalized medicine and dental regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Exploiting urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for advancing precision medicine in cell therapy, disease modeling, and drug testing.Journal of biomedical science · 2024Review
- Genome Engineering of Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells to Express Lactoferrin and Deoxyribonuclease.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2023Article
- An Overview on Promising Somatic Cell Sources Utilized for the Efficient Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- Review
- Urinary Stem Cells as Tools to Study Genetic Disease: Overview of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Studying Human Neurological Disorders Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: From 2D Monolayer to 3D Organoid and Blood Brain Barrier Models.Comprehensive physiology · 2019Review
- Application of Urine-Derived Stem Cells to Cellular Modeling in Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Diseases.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019Review
- Urine-derived cells for human cell therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2018Review
- Generation of urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells from a patient with phenylketonuria.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2018Article
- Genome Editing and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Technologies for Personalized Study of Cardiovascular Diseases.Current cardiology reports · 2018Review
- Progress and Future Prospectives in Skin-on-Chip Development with Emphasis on the use of Different Cell Types and Technical Challenges.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2017Review
- Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Modeling of Cardiac Storage Disorders.Current cardiology reports · 2017Review
- Urine-Derived Stem Cells: The Present and the Future.Stem cells international · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases with a low prevalence are a key public health issue because the causes of those diseases are difficult to determine and those diseases lack a clearly established or curative treatment. Thus, investigating the molecular mechanisms that underlie the pathology of rare diseases and facilitating the development of novel therapies using disease models is crucial. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are well suited to modeling rare diseases since they have the capacity for self-renewal and pluripotency. In addition, iPSC technology provides a valuable tool to generate patient-specific iPSCs. These cells can be differentiated into cell types that have been affected by a disease. These cells would circumvent ethical concerns and avoid immunological rejection, so they could be used in cell replacement therapy or regenerative medicine. To date, human iPSCs could have been generated from multiple donor sources, such as skin, adipose tissue, and peripheral blood. However, these cells are obtained via invasive procedures. In contrast, several groups of researchers have found that urine may be a better source for producing iPSCs from normal individuals or patients. This review discusses urinary iPSC (UiPSC) as a candidate for modeling rare diseases. Cells obtained from urine have overwhelming advantages compared to other donor sources since they are safely, affordably, and frequently obtained and they are readily obtained from patients. The use of iPSC-based models is also discussed. UiPSCs may prove to be a key means of modeling rare diseases and they may facilitate the treatment of those diseases in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.