ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2016
Results of a Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Study with SB204, an Investigational Topical Nitric Oxide-releasing Drug for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01844752 (A Multi-Center, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group, 3-arm Study Comparing the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of 2 Concentrations of NVN1000 Gel and Vehicle Gel Twice Daily in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group, 3-arm Study Comparing the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of 2 Concentrations of NVN1000 Gel and Vehicle Gel Twice Daily in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nitric oxide-releasing hyaluronic acid as an antibacterial and immunomodulatory acne therapeutic.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Acne treatment: research progress and new perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Recent advances on endogenous gasotransmitters in inflammatory dermatological disorders.Journal of advanced research · 2022Review
- New Developments in Topical Acne Therapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2022Review
- Bringing hydrogel-based craniofacial therapies to the clinic.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Review
- A Journey on the Skin Microbiome: Pitfalls and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Synthetic, Natural, and Semisynthetic Polymer Carriers for Controlled Nitric Oxide Release in Dermal Applications: A Review.Polymers · 2021Review
- Nitric Oxide-Releasing Emulsion with Hyaluronic Acid and Vitamin E.RSC advances · 2019Article
- Approaches to limit systemic antibiotic use in acne: Systemic alternatives, emerging topical therapies, dietary modification, and laser and light-based treatments.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019Review
- Host-microbiome interactions and recent progress into understanding the biology of acne vulgaris.Microbiome · 2018Review
- A review of diagnosis and treatment of acne in adult female patients.International journal of women's dermatology · 2018Review
- Insights on Localized and Systemic Delivery of Redox-Based Therapeutics.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2018Review
- Berdazimer Sodium: A Novel Nitric Oxide-Releasing Drug in Dermatology.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare efficacy, tolerability, and safety of two concentrations of topical SB204 and vehicle twice daily for 12 weeks in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
designRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, Phase 2 study.
settingDominican Republic, Panama, and Honduras.
participantsSubjects with acne, age 12 to 40, with 25 to 70 noninflammatory lesions, 20 to 40 inflammatory lesions, and a baseline Investigator's Global Assessment score of mild, moderate, or severe. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy assessment was the absolute change in noninflammatory lesion counts. Other assessments included inflammatory lesion counts, success on dichotomized Investigator's Global Assessment, reported adverse events, physical examinations, laboratory testing, and tolerability.
resultsOne hundred fifty-three subjects were randomized to vehicle (n=52), SB204 1% (n=51), or SB204 4% (n=50). When compared to vehicle, subjects treated with SB204 1% and SB204 4% had significantly greater mean percent reduction in noninflammatory lesions from baseline and subjects treated with SB204 4% had a significantly greater mean percent reduction in inflammatory lesion count from baseline at Week 12. There were no significant differences in the IGA success rates between groups. Both concentrations of SB204 were safe and well-tolerated.
conclusionsWhen compared to vehicle, both SB204 1% and SB204 4% significantly decreased the percentage of noninflammatory lesions and SB204 4% also significantly decreased the percentage of inflammatory lesions in subjects with acne vulgaris treated for 12 weeks. Treatment with SB204 1% and SB204 4% was safe and well-tolerated. Registry: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01844752).
Identifiers
27672413PMC5022991W2530303980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.