ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016
Is Handwriting Performance Affected by the Writing Surface? Comparing Preschoolers', Second Graders', and Adults' Writing Performance on a Tablet vs. Paper.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Handwriting in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Reliability Assessment and Machine Learning-Based Screening.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Specific and shared cognitive predictors of drawing and block building in typically developing children.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Muscle Activity during Handwriting on a Tablet: An Electromyographic Analysis of the Writing Process in Children and Adults.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Relationship between Product and Process Characteristics of Handwriting Skills of Children in the Second Grade of Elementary School.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Modifying Sensory Afferences on Tablet Changes Originality in Drawings.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Learning Handwriting: Factors Affecting Pen-Movement Fluency in Beginning Writers.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- A Tablet App for Handwriting Skill Screening at the Preliteracy Stage: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR serious games · 2020Article
- Drawing across media: A cross-sectional experiment on preschoolers' drawings produced using traditional versus electronic mediums.Developmental psychology · 2020Article
- Use of technological tools to evaluate handwriting production of the alphabet and pseudocharacters by Brazilian students.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2019Article
- Literacy Training of Kindergarten Children With Pencil, Keyboard or Tablet Stylus: The Influence of the Writing Tool on Reading and Writing Performance at the Letter and Word Level.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen-An Electroencephalography Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to their multifunctionality, tablets offer tremendous advantages for research on handwriting dynamics or for interactive use of learning apps in schools. Further, the widespread use of tablet computers has had a great impact on handwriting in the current generation. But, is it advisable to teach how to write and to assess handwriting in pre- and primary schoolchildren on tablets rather than on paper? Since handwriting is not automatized before the age of 10 years, children's handwriting movements require graphomotor and visual feedback as well as permanent control of movement execution during handwriting. Modifications in writing conditions, for instance the smoother writing surface of a tablet, might influence handwriting performance in general and in particular those of non-automatized beginning writers. In order to investigate how handwriting performance is affected by a difference in friction of the writing surface, we recruited three groups with varying levels of handwriting automaticity: 25 preschoolers, 27 second graders, and 25 adults. We administered three tasks measuring graphomotor abilities, visuomotor abilities, and handwriting performance (only second graders and adults). We evaluated two aspects of handwriting performance: the handwriting quality with a visual score and the handwriting dynamics using online handwriting measures [e.g., writing duration, writing velocity, strokes and number of inversions in velocity (NIV)]. In particular, NIVs which describe the number of velocity peaks during handwriting are directly related to the level of handwriting automaticity. In general, we found differences between writing on paper compared to the tablet. These differences were partly task-dependent. The comparison between tablet and paper revealed a faster writing velocity for all groups and all tasks on the tablet which indicates that all participants-even the experienced writers-were influenced by the lower friction of the tablet surface. Our results for the group-comparison show advancing levels in handwriting automaticity from preschoolers to second graders to adults, which confirms that our method depicts handwriting performance in groups with varying degrees of handwriting automaticity. We conclude that the smoother tablet surface requires additional control of handwriting movements and therefore might present an additional challenge for learners of handwriting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.