Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27672364›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2016

Efficient Integration of Coupled Electrical-Chemical Systems in Multiscale Neuronal Simulations.

Ekaterina Brocke, Upinder S Bhalla, Mikael Djurfeldt, Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski, Michael Hanke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tutorial: using NEURON for neuromechanical simulations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ekaterina BrockeScience for Life Laboratory, Computational Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholm, Sweden; National Centre for Biological SciencesBangalore, India; Manipal UniversityManipal, India.
Upinder S BhallaNational Centre for Biological Sciences Bangalore, India.
Mikael DjurfeldtPDC Center for High-Performance Computing, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholm, Sweden; International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Karolinska InstituteStockholm, Sweden.
Jeanette Hellgren KotaleskiScience for Life Laboratory, Computational Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholm, Sweden; Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Stockholm UniversityStockholm, Sweden; Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstituteStockholm, Sweden.
Michael HankeDepartment of Mathematics, School of Engineering Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiscale modeling and simulations in neuroscience is gaining scientific attention due to its growing importance and unexplored capabilities. For instance, it can help to acquire better understanding of biological phenomena that have important features at multiple scales of time and space. This includes synaptic plasticity, memory formation and modulation, homeostasis. There are several ways to organize multiscale simulations depending on the scientific problem and the system to be modeled. One of the possibilities is to simulate different components of a multiscale system simultaneously and exchange data when required. The latter may become a challenging task for several reasons. First, the components of a multiscale system usually span different spatial and temporal scales, such that rigorous analysis of possible coupling solutions is required. Then, the components can be defined by different mathematical formalisms. For certain classes of problems a number of coupling mechanisms have been proposed and successfully used. However, a strict mathematical theory is missing in many cases. Recent work in the field has not so far investigated artifacts that may arise during coupled integration of different approximation methods. Moreover, in neuroscience, the coupling of widely used numerical fixed step size solvers may lead to unexpected inefficiency. In this paper we address the question of possible numerical artifacts that can arise during the integration of a coupled system. We develop an efficient strategy to couple the components comprising a multiscale test problem in neuroscience. We introduce an efficient coupling method based on the second-order backward differentiation formula (BDF2) numerical approximation. The method uses an adaptive step size integration with an error estimation proposed by Skelboe (2000). The method shows a significant advantage over conventional fixed step size solvers used in neuroscience for similar problems. We explore different coupling strategies that define the organization of computations between system components. We study the importance of an appropriate approximation of exchanged variables during the simulation. The analysis shows a substantial impact of these aspects on the solution accuracy in the application to our multiscale neuroscientific test problem. We believe that the ideas presented in the paper may essentially contribute to the development of a robust and efficient framework for multiscale brain modeling and simulations in neuroscience.

Indexed as

adaptive time step integrationbackward differentiation formulaco-simulationcoupled integrationcoupled systemmultiscale modelingmultiscale simulationparallel numerical integration

Identifiers

PMID27672364
PMCPMC5018489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.