ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016
Transanal surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome: Literature review and a single-center experience.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05037422 (Single-center Retrospective Study of the Long-term Results of the Stapled TransAnal Rectal Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Single-center Retrospective Study of the Long-term Results of the Stapled TransAnal Rectal Resection (STARR) Operation Proposed in the Treatment of a Rectocele in Consecutive Patients
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Khubchandani's procedure combined with stapled posterior rectal wall resection for rectocele.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Trial
- Transanal minimally invasive (TAMIS) mucosal resection with muscular plication for patients with obstructed defecation syndrome-A prospective pilot study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Stapled trans-anal rectal resection can improve constipation symptoms and inflammatory reaction of patients with outlet obstructive constipation.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome: still the way to go?International urogynecology journal · 2017Article
- Postoperative MR Defecography following Failed STARR Procedure for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome: A Three-Centre Experience.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a functional disorder commonly encountered by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists, and greatly affects the quality of life of patients from both societal and psychological aspects. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes of ODS are complex. However, intra-rectal intussusception and rectocele are frequently found in patients with ODS and both are thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of ODS. With the development of evaluation methods in anorectal physiology laboratories and radiology studies, a great variety of new operative procedures, especially transanal procedures, have been invented to treat ODS. However, no procedure has been proved to be superior to others at present. Each operation has its own merits and defects. Thus, choosing appropriate transanal surgical procedures for the treatment of ODS remains a challenge for all surgeons. This review provides an introduction of the current problems and options for treatment of ODS and a detailed summary of the essential assessments needed for patient evaluation before carrying out transanal surgery. Besides, an overview of the benefits and problems of current transanal surgical procedures for treatment of ODS is summarized in this review. A report of clinical experience of some transanal surgical techniques used in the authors' center is also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.