Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27672153›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

When pathogenic bacteria meet the intestinal microbiota.

Nathalie Rolhion, Benoit Chassaing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  12. Antibacterial Activity of Ethanolic Extracts ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Effects of JUNCAOAnimal biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nathalie RolhionInstitut Pasteur, Unité des interactions Bactéries-Cellules, 75015 Paris, France Inserm, U604, 75015 Paris, France INRA, Unité sous contrat 2020, 75015 Paris, France nathalie.rolhion@pasteur.fr.
Benoit ChassaingInstitute for Biomedical Sciences, Center for Inflammation, Immunity, and Infection, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA bchassaing@gsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4285-769X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota is a large and diverse microbial community that inhabits the intestinal tract, containing about 100 trillion bacteria from 500-1000 distinct species that, collectively, provide multiple benefits to the host. The gut microbiota contributes to nutrient absorption and maturation of the immune system, and also plays a central role in protection of the host from enteric bacterial infection. On the other hand, many enteric pathogens have developed strategies in order to be able to outcompete the intestinal community, leading to infection and/or chronic diseases. This review will summarize findings describing the complex relationship occurring between the intestinal microbiota and enteric pathogens, as well as how future therapies can ultimately benefit from such discoveries.This article is part of the themed issue 'The new bacteriology'.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansinflammationintestinal microbiotanutrientpathogenic bacteriavirulence

Identifiers

PMID27672153
PMCPMC5052746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.