Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27672114›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Reconstructing the Backbone of the Saccharomycotina Yeast Phylogeny Using Genome-Scale Data.

Xing-Xing Shen, Xiaofan Zhou, Jacek Kominek, Cletus P Kurtzman, Chris Todd Hittinger, Antonis Rokas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Accurate, scalable, and fully automated inference of species trees from raw genome assemblies using ROADIES.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The metabolic domestication syndrome of budding yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Incongruence in the phylogenomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A global phylogenomic analysis of the shiitake genusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xing-Xing ShenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235.
Xiaofan ZhouDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235.ORCID 0000-0002-2879-6317
Jacek KominekLaboratory of Genetics, Genome Center of Wisconsin, DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.ORCID 0000-0002-1916-0122
Cletus P KurtzmanMycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Peoria, Illinois 61604 antonis.rokas@vanderbilt.edu.
Chris Todd HittingerLaboratory of Genetics, Genome Center of Wisconsin, DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 antonis.rokas@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5088-7461
Antonis RokasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235 antonis.rokas@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-6551

Funding

Midgut Transcriptome and Proteome Analyses: Non-model Anopheline Malaria VectorsR21AI105619 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DINGLASAN, RHOEL DAVID RAMOS · 2014 to 2015
$454k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI105619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the phylogenetic relationships among the yeasts of the subphylum Saccharomycotina is a prerequisite for understanding the evolution of their metabolisms and ecological lifestyles. In the last two decades, the use of rDNA and multilocus data sets has greatly advanced our understanding of the yeast phylogeny, but many deep relationships remain unsupported. In contrast, phylogenomic analyses have involved relatively few taxa and lineages that were often selected with limited considerations for covering the breadth of yeast biodiversity. Here we used genome sequence data from 86 publicly available yeast genomes representing nine of the 11 known major lineages and 10 nonyeast fungal outgroups to generate a 1233-gene, 96-taxon data matrix. Species phylogenies reconstructed using two different methods (concatenation and coalescence) and two data matrices (amino acids or the first two codon positions) yielded identical and highly supported relationships between the nine major lineages. Aside from the lineage comprised by the family Pichiaceae, all other lineages were monophyletic. Most interrelationships among yeast species were robust across the two methods and data matrices. However, eight of the 93 internodes conflicted between analyses or data sets, including the placements of: the clade defined by species that have reassigned the CUG codon to encode serine, instead of leucine; the clade defined by a whole genome duplication; and the species Ascoidea rubescens These phylogenomic analyses provide a robust roadmap for future comparative work across the yeast subphylum in the disciplines of taxonomy, molecular genetics, evolutionary biology, ecology, and biotechnology. To further this end, we have also provided a BLAST server to query the 86 Saccharomycotina genomes, which can be found at http://y1000plus.org/blast.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalGenomicsPhylogenyAscomycotaComputational BiologyGenetic MarkersWorkflowGenetic Markersgenome completenessincongruencemaximum likelihoodnuclear markersphylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID27672114
PMCPMC5144963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.