Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27672099›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2017

Spine Metastasis Practice Patterns among Korean, Chinese, and Japanese Radiation Oncologists: A Multinational Online Survey Study.

Jeong Il Yu, Hee Chul Park, Yong Chan Ahn, Xian-Shu Gao, Jun-Jie Wang, Zhao-Chong Zeng, Yoshinori Ito, Tatsuya Ohno, Yasumasa Nishimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeong Il YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea.
Hee Chul ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea hee.ro.park@samsung.com.
Yong Chan AhnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea.
Xian-Shu GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jun-Jie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhao-Chong ZengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yoshinori ItoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya OhnoGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan.
Yasumasa NishimuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This online survey of practising radiation oncologists from Korea, China and Japan was conducted to investigate the current practices in radiotherapy (RT) for spine metastasis and to compare these practices across the three countries. The questionnaire included nine general information questions and two clinical scenarios (representing 'typical' and 'good' prognosis spine metastasis), with seven questions for each scenario. An anonymous web-based survey using Google Docs® was undertaken from 2 September 2014 to 9 April 2015. A total of 54 Korean, 107 Chinese and 104 Japanese radiation oncologists participated in the study. The first scenario involved a typical case of spine metastasis (~25% expected 1-year survival rate), and the preferred fractionation scheme was 10 fractions of 3 Gy, though the pattern was slightly different in each country. The second scenario involved a good prognosis case (>50% expected 1-year survival rate), and 10 fractions of 3 Gy was the preferred practice in all three countries (however, use of a larger fraction dose with a smaller fraction number was more common in Korea). A more conformal RT technique was more prominent in China and Korea, especially for patients with a good prognosis. Avoidance of reirradiation was notable in China. In summary, a preference for multiple fractionation in RT for spine metastasis was observed in the majority of Korean, Chinese and Japanese radiation oncologists, although there were slight differences in practice preferences, especially for patients with a favorable prognosis.

Indexed as

InternationalityInternetSurveys and QuestionnairesChinaDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansJapanPractice Patterns, Physicians'Radiation OncologyRadiosurgeryRe-IrradiationRepublic of KoreaSpinal NeoplasmsSteroidsSteroidsdata collectionmetastasisneoplasmphysician's practice patternsradiotherapyspine

Identifiers

PMID27672099
PMCPMC5321193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.