Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27671925›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology2017

How to optimise drug study design: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies introduced to paediatricians.

Eric Vermeulen, John N van den Anker, Oscar Della Pasqua, Kalle Hoppu, Johanna H van der Lee, Global Research in Paediatrics (GRiP)

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Animal Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Studies (APPS) Reporting Guidelines.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric VermeulenPediatric Clinical Research Office, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John N van den AnkerDivision of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA.
Oscar Della PasquaClinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, UK.
Kalle HoppuPoison Information Centre, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna H van der LeePediatric Clinical Research Office, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Global Research in Paediatrics (GRiP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn children, there is often lack of sufficient information concerning the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a study drug to support dose selection and effective evaluation of efficacy in a randomised clinical trial (RCT). Therefore, one should consider the relevance of relatively small PKPD studies, which can provide the appropriate data to optimise the design of an RCT.

methodsBased on the experience of experts collaborating in the EU-funded Global Research in Paediatrics consortium, we aimed to inform clinician-scientists working with children on the design of investigator-initiated PKPD studies. KEY

findingsThe importance of the identification of an optimal dose for the paediatric population is explained, followed by the differences and similarities of dose-ranging and efficacy studies. The input of clinical pharmacologists with modelling expertise is essential for an efficient dose-finding study.

conclusionsThe emergence of new laboratory techniques and statistical tools allows for the collection and analysis of sparse and unbalanced data, enabling the implementation of (observational) PKPD studies in the paediatric clinic. Understanding of the principles and methods discussed in this study is essential to improve the quality of paediatric PKPD investigations, and to prevent the conduct of paediatric RCTs that fail because of inadequate dosing.

Indexed as

PediatriciansPhysician's RoleResearch DesignChildHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPharmaceutical Preparationspaediatricspharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID27671925
PMCPMC6084327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.