Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27671840›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Regression in thin melanoma is associated with nodal recurrence after a negative sentinel node biopsy.

Jill C Rubinstein, Gang Han, Laura Jackson, Kaleigh Bulloch, Stephan Ariyan, Deepak Narayan, Bonnie G Rothberg, Dale Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regression and Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Melanoma Progression.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jill C RubinsteinSection of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520.
Gang HanDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Texas A&M, College Station, Texas, 77843.
Laura JacksonMedical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520.
Kaleigh BullochMedical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520.
Stephan AriyanSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520.
Deepak NarayanSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520.
Bonnie G RothbergMedical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520.
Dale HanSection of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520. dale.han@yale.edu.
Yale University · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Prognostic markers in metastatic melanomaK08CA151645 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GOULD ROTHBERG, BONNIE ELYSSA · 2010 to 2014
$527k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS K08 CA151645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostic markers for nodal metastasis in thin melanoma patients are debated. We present a single institution study looking at factors predictive of nodal disease in thin melanoma patients. Retrospective review from 1997 to 2012 identified 252 patients with thin melanoma (≤1 mm) who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Node-positive patients included positive SLNB patients and negative SLNB patients who developed a nodal recurrence (false-negative SLNB). Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with nodal status and outcome. Median follow-up was 45.5 months. Twelve of 252 patients (4.8%) were node-positive including six positive SLNB (2.4%) and six false-negative SLNB (2.4%) patients. No clinicopathologic factors were significantly correlated with nodal disease. For the six false-negative SLNB patients, median time to nodal recurrence was 37.5 months. Regression was seen in only 16% of cases, but the rate increased to 60% for false-negative SLNB cases. Both age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17; P = 0.02) and regression (OR: 8.33, 95% CI: 1.34-52.63; P = 0.02) were significantly associated with nodal recurrence after a negative SLNB on univariable analysis. Nodal disease in thin melanoma patients was seen in 4.8% of cases. Although regression was not correlated with nodal metastasis, it was correlated with a false-negative SLNB. Patients with thin melanoma and regression may need more intensive surveillance after a negative SLNB. Further study is needed to determine if the same immune mechanisms that result in regression in primary tumors also lead to regression in lymph nodes, which may decrease detection of melanoma nodal metastases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeNodal recurrenceregressionsentinel lymph node biopsythin melanoma

Identifiers

PMID27671840
PMCPMC5083736
OpenAlexW2525728917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.