Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27671740›Full record

ReviewLipids in health and disease2016

Revisiting the membrane-centric view of diabetes.

Marc Pilon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lipids in health and disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc PilonDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 9, Box 462, S-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden. marc.pilon@cmb.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-2882
University of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundamental questions remain unresolved in diabetes: What is the actual mechanism of glucose toxicity? Why is there insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes? Why do diets rich in sugars or saturated fatty acids increase the risk of developing diabetes? Studying the C. elegans homologs of the anti-diabetic adiponectin receptors (AdipoR1 and AdipoR2) has led us to exciting new discoveries and to revisit what may be termed "The Membrane Theory of Diabetes". We hypothesize that excess saturated fatty acids (obtained through a diet rich in saturated fats or through conversion of sugars into saturated fats via lipogenesis) leads to rigid cellular membranes that in turn impair insulin signalling, glucose uptake and blood circulation, thus creating a vicious cycle that contributes to the development of overt type 2 diabetes. This hypothesis is supported by our own studies in C. elegans and by a wealth of literature concerning membrane composition in diabetics. The purpose of this review is to survey this literature in the light of the new results, and to provide an admittedly membrane-centric view of diabetes.

Indexed as

AdipoR1AdipoR2DiabetesDietFatty acidsLipidomicsMembrane fluidityPAQR-2Phospholipid

Identifiers

PMID27671740
PMCPMC5037885
OpenAlexW2526292360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.