Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27671661›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Pallidal spiking activity reflects learning dynamics and predicts performance.

Eitan Schechtman, Maria Imelda Noblejas, Aviv D Mizrahi, Omer Dauber, Hagai Bergman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cognitive functions of the GPe.Trends in neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  3. GPe Projections to the Retrorubral Field Give Rise to Diverging GABAergic and DAergic Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hemispheric Asymmetry of Globus Pallidus Relates to Alpha Modulation in Reward-Related Attentional Tasks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Errors in Action Timing and Inhibition Facilitate Learning by Tuning Distinct Mechanisms in the Underlying Decision Process.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eitan SchechtmanEdmond and Lily Safra Centre for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Safra Campus, Jerusalem, Israel 9190401; eitan.schechtman@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-8127-012X
Maria Imelda NoblejasDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Medical Research-Israel Canada, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 9112001.
Aviv D MizrahiDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Medical Research-Israel Canada, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 9112001.
Omer DauberDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Medical Research-Israel Canada, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 9112001.
Hagai BergmanEdmond and Lily Safra Centre for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Safra Campus, Jerusalem, Israel 9190401; Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Medical Research-Israel Canada, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 9112001.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basal ganglia (BG) network has been divided into interacting actor and critic components, modulating the probabilities of different state-action combinations through learning. Most models of learning and decision making in the BG focus on the roles of the striatum and its dopaminergic inputs, commonly overlooking the complexities and interactions of BG downstream nuclei. In this study, we aimed to reveal the learning-related activity of the external segment of the globus pallidus (GPe), a downstream structure whose computational role has remained relatively unexplored. Recording from monkeys engaged in a deterministic three-choice reversal learning task, we found that changes in GPe discharge rates predicted subsequent behavioral shifts on a trial-by-trial basis. Furthermore, the activity following the shift encoded whether it resulted in reward or not. The frequent changes in stimulus-outcome contingencies (i.e., reversals) allowed us to examine the learning-related neural activity and show that GPe discharge rates closely matched across-trial learning dynamics. Additionally, firing rates exhibited a linear decrease in sequences of correct responses, possibly reflecting a gradual shift from goal-directed execution to automaticity. Thus, modulations in GPe spiking activity are highest for attention-demanding aspects of behavior (i.e., switching choices) and decrease as attentional demands decline (i.e., as performance becomes automatic). These findings are contrasted with results from striatal tonically active neurons, which show none of these task-related modulations. Our results demonstrate that GPe, commonly studied in motor contexts, takes part in cognitive functions, in which movement plays a marginal role.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChlorocebus aethiopsCorpus StriatumFemaleGlobus PallidusLearningNeural PathwaysRewardactor–critic modelattentionbasal gangliaglobus palliduslearning

Identifiers

PMID27671661
PMCPMC5068334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.