Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27671523›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Women's and clinicians perspectives of presentation with reduced fetal movements: a qualitative study.

R M D Smyth, W Taylor, A E Heazell, C Furber, M Whitworth, T Lavender

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R M D SmythDivision of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. rebecca.smyth@manchester.ac.uk.
W TaylorMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre 5th Floor (Research) St Mary's Hospital Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
A E HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre 5th Floor (Research) St Mary's Hospital Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
C FurberDivision of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
M WhitworthMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre 5th Floor (Research) St Mary's Hospital Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
T LavenderDivision of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
St Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2013-13-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide maternal perception of fetal movements has been used for many years to evaluate fetal wellbeing. It is intuitively regarded as an expression of fetal well-being as pregnancies in which women consistently report regular fetal movements have very low morbidity and mortality. Conversely, maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We sought to gain insight into pregnant women's and clinicians views and experiences of reduced movements.

methodWe performed qualitative semi-structured interviews with pregnant women who experienced reduced fetal movements in their current pregnancy and health professionals who provide maternity care. Our aim was to develop a better understanding of events, facilitators and barriers to presentation with reduced fetal movements. Data analysis was conducted using framework analysis principles.

resultsTwenty-one women and 10 clinicians were interviewed. The themes that emerged following the final coding were influences of social network, facilitators and barriers to presentation and the desire for normality.

conclusionsThis study aids understanding about why women present with reduced movements and how they reach the decision to attend hospital. This should inform professionals' views and practice, such that appreciating and addressing women's concerns may reduce anxiety and make presentation with further reduced movements more likely, which is desirable as this group is at increased risk of adverse outcome. To address problems with information about normal and abnormal fetal movements, high-quality information is needed that is accessible to women and their families.

Indexed as

CliniciansInterviewsManagementMaternal experienceQualitativeReduced fetal movements

Identifiers

PMID27671523
PMCPMC5037887
OpenAlexW2524442291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.