Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27671335›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2017

ECM Composition and Rheology Regulate Growth, Motility, and Response to Photodynamic Therapy in 3D Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Gwendolyn M Cramer, Dustin P Jones, Hamid El-Hamidi, Jonathan P Celli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Appetizer on soft matter physics concepts in mechanobiology.Development, growth & differentiation · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Passive and Active Microrheology for Biomedical Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gwendolyn M CramerDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dustin P JonesDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hamid El-HamidiDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan P CelliDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts. jonathan.celli@umb.edu.
Boston University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

Mechanism-based therapies for pancreatic cancer informed by stromal microrheologyR00CA155045 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI CELLI, JONATHAN P · 2013 to 2015
$708k
Mechanism-based therapies for pancreatic cancer informed by stromal microrheologyK99CA155045 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI CELLI, JONATHAN P · 2011 to 2012
$324k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA155045NCI NIH HHS R00 CA155045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by prominent stromal involvement, which plays complex roles in regulating tumor growth and therapeutic response. The extracellular matrix (ECM)-rich stroma associated with this disease has been implicated as a barrier to drug penetration, although stromal depletion strategies have had mixed clinical success. It remains less clear how interactions with ECM, acting as a biophysical regulator of phenotype, not only a barrier to drug perfusion, regulate susceptibilities and resistance to specific therapies. In this context, an integrative approach is used to evaluate invasive behavior and motility in rheologically characterized ECM as determinants of chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) responses. We show that in 3D cultures with ECM conditions that promote invasive progression, response to PDT is markedly enhanced in the most motile ECM-infiltrating populations, whereas the same cells exhibit chemoresistance. Conversely, drug-resistant sublines with enhanced invasive potential were generated to compare differential treatment response in identical ECM conditions, monitored by particle tracking microrheology measurements of matrix remodeling. In both scenarios, ECM-infiltrating cell populations exhibit increased sensitivity to PDT, whether invasion is consequent to selection of chemoresistance, or whether chemoresistance is correlated with acquisition of invasive behavior. However, while ECM-invading, chemoresistant cells exhibit mesenchymal phenotype, induction of EMT in monolayers without ECM was not sufficient to enhance PDT sensitivity, yet does impart chemoresistance as expected. In addition to containing platform development with broader applicability to inform microenvironment-dependent therapeutics, these results reveal the efficacy of PDT for targeting the most aggressive, chemoresistant, invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma associated with dismal outcomes for this disease. IMPLICATIONS: ECM-infiltrating and chemoresistant pancreatic tumor populations exhibit increased sensitivity to PDT. Mol Cancer Res; 15(1); 15-25. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Cell MovementModels, BiologicalPhotochemotherapyRheologyAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionExtracellular MatrixHumansMesodermNeoplasm InvasivenessPancreatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27671335
PMCPMC5381935
OpenAlexW2526800142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.