Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27670793›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of cardiology2016

Relation of Statin Use and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Frail Older Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Alberto Pilotto, Pietro Gallina, Francesco Panza, Massimiliano Copetti, Alberto Cella, Alfonso Cruz-Jentoft, Julia Daragjati, Luigi Ferrucci, Stefania Maggi, Francesco Mattace-Raso and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Alberto PilottoDepartment of Geriatric Care, OrthoGeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Frailty Area, E.O. Galliera Hospital, National Relevance and High Specialization Hospital, Genoa, Italy; Geriatrics Unit, Azienda ULSS 16 Padova, S. Antonio Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Pietro GallinaHealth Directorate, Azienda ULSS 16, Padua, Italy.
Francesco PanzaNeurodegenerative Disease Unit, Department of Basic Medicine, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. Electronic address: geriat.dot@geriatria.uniba.it.
Massimiliano CopettiUnit of Biostatistics, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
Alberto CellaDepartment of Geriatric Care, OrthoGeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Frailty Area, E.O. Galliera Hospital, National Relevance and High Specialization Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Alfonso Cruz-JentoftHospital Universitario Ramòn y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Julia DaragjatiGeriatrics Unit, Azienda ULSS 16 Padova, S. Antonio Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Luigi FerrucciNational Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stefania MaggiNational Research Council, Neuroscience Section, Padua, Italy.
Francesco Mattace-RasoErasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc PaccalinUniversity Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Maria Cristina PolidoriUnit for Aging Clinical Research, Department of Medicine II, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Eva TopinkovaUniversity Charles I, Prague, Czech Republic.
Gianluca TrifiròErasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Anna-Karin WelmerAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Timo StrandbergGeriatric Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Institute of Health Sciences/Geriatrics, University of Oulu, and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Niccolò MarchionniDivision of Geriatric Cardiology and Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
MPI_AGE Project Investigators
Ospedale Sant Antonio · ITCharles University · CZEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITErasmus MC · NLHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITKarolinska Institutet · SENational Institute on Aging · USNational Research Council · ITOulu University Hospital · FIUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical decision-making for statin treatment in older patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is under debate, particularly in community-dwelling frail patients at high risk of death. In this retrospective observational study on 2,597 community-dwelling patients aged ≥65 years with a previous hospitalization for CAD, we estimated mortality risk assessed with the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), based on the Standardized Multidimensional Assessment Schedule for Adults and Aged Persons (SVaMA), used to determine accessibility to homecare services/nursing home admission in 2005 to 2013 in the Padua Health District, Veneto, Italy. Participants were categorized as having mild (MPI-SVaMA-1), moderate (MPI-SVaMA-2), and high (MPI-SVaMA-3) baseline mortality risk, and propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 3-year mortality rate were calculated according to statin treatment in these subgroups. Greater MPI-SVaMA scores were associated with lower rates of statin treatment and higher 3-year mortality rate (MPI-SVaMA-1 = 23.4%; MPI-SVaMA-2 = 39.1%; MPI-SVaMA-3 = 76.2%). After adjusting for propensity score quintiles, statin treatment was associated with lower 3-year mortality risk irrespective of MPI-SVaMA group (HRs [95% confidence intervals] 0.45 [0.37 to 0.55], 0.44 [0.36 to 0.53], and 0.28 [0.21 to 0.39] in MPI-SVaMA-1, -2, and -3 groups, respectively [interaction test p = 0.202]). Subgroup analyses showed that statin treatment was also beneficial irrespective of age (HRs [95% confidence intervals] 0.38 [0.27 to 0.53], 0.45 [0.38 to 0.54], and 0.44 [0.37 to 0.54] in 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and ≥85 year age groups, respectively [interaction test p = 0.597]). In conclusion, in community-dwelling frail older patients with CAD, statin treatment was significantly associated with reduced 3-year mortality rate irrespective of age and multidimensional impairment, although the frailest patients were less likely to be treated with statins.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingFrail ElderlyHealth Status IndicatorsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsItalyMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27670793
PMCPMC6121726
OpenAlexW2518217552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.