Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27670618›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2016

An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Marlon Perera, Nishanth Krishnananthan, Uri Lindner, Nathan Lawrentschuk

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Intraprostatic Tumor Segmentation on PSMA PET Images in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer with a Convolutional Neural Network.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marlon PereraUniversity of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3088, Australia.
Nishanth KrishnananthanUniversity of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3088, Australia.
Uri LindnerDepartment of Urology, Kaplan Medical Centre, Pasternak Street, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Nathan LawrentschukUniversity of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3088, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, the increased uptake of serum PSA level screening led to an increase in the number of diagnoses of low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Traditionally, these patients have been considered for either active surveillance programmes or radical whole-gland therapies, such as prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Focal therapy is an emerging treatment option that involves the focal ablation of prostate cancer with preservation of surrounding healthy tissue. This approach might result in reduced morbidity when compared with whole-gland therapies. In current practice, much controversy surrounds optimal patient selection and preoperative tumour localization strategies. Focal therapy modalities include cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, laser ablation, photodynamic therapy, irreversible electroporation, radiofrequency ablation and focal brachytherapy. However, as long-term oncological data for focal therapies are lacking, formal recommendations for its use cannot be made.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionBrachytherapyCatheter AblationCryotherapyElectroporationHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansLaser TherapyMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPhotochemotherapyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.