Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27669755›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations in squamous differentiated bladder cancer: a putative therapeutic target for a small subgroup.

Philipp H Baldia, Angela Maurer, Timon Heide, Michael Rose, Robert Stoehr, Arndt Hartmann, Sarah V Williams, Margaret A Knowles, Ruth Knuechel, Nadine T Gaisa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of FGFR3International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Philipp H BaldiaInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Angela MaurerInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Timon HeideInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Michael RoseInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Robert StoehrInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Sarah V WilliamsSection of Molecular Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, United Kingdom.
Margaret A KnowlesSection of Molecular Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, United Kingdom.
Ruth KnuechelInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Nadine T GaisaInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DESt James's University Hospital · GBUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although drugable fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations in squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of various entities are well known, little is known about FGFR modifications in squamous differentiated bladder cancer. Therefore, our study evaluated FGFR1-3 alterations as a putative therapeutic target in this subgroup. We analyzed 73 squamous differentiated bladder cancers (n = 10 pT2, n = 55 pT3, n = 8 pT4) for FGFR1-3 protein expression, FGFR1-3 copy number variations, FGFR3 chromosomal rearrangements (fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)) and FGFR3 mutations (SNapShot analysis). Only single cases displayed enhanced protein expression, most frequently FGFR3 overexpression (9.4% (6/64)). FISH showed no amplifications of FGFR1, 2 or 3. Break apart events were only slightly above the cut off in 12.1% (8/66) of cases and no FGFR3-TACC3 rearrangements could be proven by qPCR. FGFR3 mutations (p.S249C) were found in 8.5% (6/71) of tumors and were significantly associated with FGFR3 protein overexpression (p < 0.001), and unfavourable clinical outcome (p = 0.001). Our findings are consistent with the results of the TCGA data set for the "squamous-like" subtype of bladder cancer (n = 85), which revealed reduced overall expression of FGFR1 and FGFR2 in tumors compared to normal tissue, while expression of FGFR3 remained high. In the TCGA "squamous-like" subtype FGFR3 mutations were found in 4.9% and correlated with high FGFR3 RNA expression. Mutations of FGFR1 and FGFR2 were less frequent (2.4% and 1.2%). Hence, our comprehensive study provides novel insights into a subgroup of squamous differentiated bladder tumors that hold clues for novel therapeutic regimens and may benefit from FGFR3-targeted therapies.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsYoung AdultReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorFGFR1FGFR2FGFR3fibroblast growth factor receptorsquamous bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID27669755
PMCPMC5342089
OpenAlexW2522021576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.