Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27669715›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2016

Validation of ultraviolet, infrared, and narrow band light alternate light sources for detection of bruises in a pigskin model.

Kelly Olds, Roger W Byard, Calle Winskog, Neil E I Langlois

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Infrared thermography for detection of blunt-force trauma injuries during animal abuse investigations.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly OldsSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Roger W ByardSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Calle WinskogSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Neil E I LangloisSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. Neil.Langlois@sa.gov.au.
University of Adelaide · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternate light sources such as ultraviolet, narrow band, and infrared have been used in an attempt to reveal the presence of bruising that is not otherwise apparent (inapparent). The following study evaluates the ability of alternate light sources to enhance visibility of bruises by employing an objective assessment of digital photography images in conjunction with histology. A pigskin model was employed with bruises created by injection of blood to be not visible or barely visible (inapparent) under white light. The pigskin was photographed using alternate light source illumination. Images were assessed using the program Fiji

Indexed as

Infrared RaysUltraviolet RaysAnimalsContusionsForensic PathologyImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhotographySpectrophotometrySwineAlternate light sourcesBruisesEnhancementInfraredNarrow bandUltraviolet

Identifiers

PMID27669715
OpenAlexW2524608559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.