Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27669394›Full record

ArticleEvaluation and program planning2017

A participatory evaluation framework in the establishment and implementation of transdisciplinary collaborative centers for health disparities research.

Isabel C Scarinci, Artisha Moore, Regina Benjamin, Selwyn Vickers, James Shikany, Mona Fouad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a Community-engaged Research Training Workshop for Clinician-Scientists and Early-stage Investigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabel C ScarinciUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Preventive Medicine, 1530 - 3rd Avenue S., Birmingham, AL 35294-4410, United States. Electronic address: Scarinci@uab.edu.
Artisha MooreUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Preventive Medicine, 1530 - 3rd Avenue S., Birmingham, AL 35294-4410, United States.
Regina BenjaminBayou Clinic, 13833 Tapia Lane, Bayou La Batre, Alabama 36509, United States.
Selwyn VickersUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Preventive Medicine, 1530 - 3rd Avenue S., Birmingham, AL 35294-4410, United States.
James ShikanyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Preventive Medicine, 1530 - 3rd Avenue S., Birmingham, AL 35294-4410, United States.
Mona FouadUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Preventive Medicine, 1530 - 3rd Avenue S., Birmingham, AL 35294-4410, United States.

Funding

University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
Research CoreU54MD008602 · NIMHD · BAYOUCLINIC, INC. · PI HULLETT, SANDRAL · 2013 to 2017
$13.8M
Molecular and Soc. Determinants of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders in YouthU54MD008176 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BASKIN, MONICA L. · 2012 to 2016
$13.7M
Research CoreU54MD008620 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KONETY, BADRINATH R, SHIKANY, JAMES M · 2013 to 2017
$13.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD008176NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD008602NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD008620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe describe the formulation and implementation of a participatory evaluation plan for three Transdisciplinary Collaborative Centers for Health Disparities Research funded by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities.

methodsAlthough different in scope of work, all three centers share a common goal of establishing sustainable centers in health disparities science in three priority areas - social determinants of health, men's health research, and health policy research.

resultsThe logic model guides the process, impact, and outcome evaluation. Emphasis is placed on process evaluation in order to establish a "blue print" that can guide other efforts as well as assure that activities are being implemented as planned.

conclusionWe have learned three major lessons in this process: (1) Significant engagement, participation, and commitment of all involved is critical for the evaluation process; (2) Having a "roadmap" (logic model) and "directions" (evaluation worksheets) are instrumental in getting members from different backgrounds to follow the same path; and (3) Participation of the evaluator in the leadership and core meetings facilitates continuous feedback.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHealth Status DisparitiesInterdisciplinary CommunicationCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHealth PolicyHumansMinority HealthProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationResearch DesignEvaluationFrameworksHealth disparitiesTransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID27669394
PMCPMC5402692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.