Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27668807›Full record

SynthesisJAMA neurology2016

Genome Editing of Monogenic Neuromuscular Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Chengzu Long, Leonela Amoasii, Rhonda Bassel-Duby, Eric N Olson

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Various Aspects of a Gene Editing System-CRISPR-Cas9.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Therapeutic potential of combined viral transduction and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in treating neurodegenerative diseases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Review
  14. Myotonic Dystrophies: Targeting Therapies for Multisystem Disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  15. Molecular Therapies for Muscular Dystrophies.Current treatment options in neurology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengzu LongDepartment of Molecular Biology, Senator Paul D. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Center and Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Leonela AmoasiiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Senator Paul D. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Center and Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Rhonda Bassel-DubyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Senator Paul D. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Center and Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Eric N OlsonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Senator Paul D. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Center and Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Training CoreU54HD087351 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI OLSON, ERIC N · 2015 to 2019
$7.8M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD087351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceMuscle weakness, the most common symptom of neuromuscular disease, may result from muscle dysfunction or may be caused indirectly by neuronal and neuromuscular junction abnormalities. To date, more than 780 monogenic neuromuscular diseases, linked to 417 different genes, have been identified in humans. Genome-editing methods, especially the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein 9) system, hold clinical potential for curing many monogenic disorders, including neuromuscular diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and myotonic dystrophy type 1.

objectivesTo provide an overview of genome-editing approaches; to summarize published reports on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of current genome-editing methods as they relate to the potential correction of monogenic neuromuscular diseases; and to highlight scientific and clinical opportunities and obstacles toward permanent correction of disease-causing mutations responsible for monogenic neuromuscular diseases by genome editing. EVIDENCE REVIEW: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for articles published from June 30, 1989, through June 9, 2016, using the following keywords: genome editing, CRISPR-Cas9, neuromuscular disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and myotonic dystrophy type 1. The following sources were reviewed: 341 articles describing different approaches to edit mammalian genomes; 330 articles describing CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in cell culture lines (in vitro) and animal models (in vivo); 16 websites used to generate single-guide RNA; 4 websites for off-target effects; and 382 articles describing viral and nonviral delivery systems. Articles describing neuromuscular diseases, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and myotonic dystrophy type 1, were also reviewed.

findingsMultiple proof-of-concept studies reveal the feasibility and efficacy of genome-editing-meditated correction of monogenic neuromuscular diseases in cultured cells and animal models. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Genome editing is a rapidly evolving technology with enormous translational potential once efficacy, delivery, and safety issues are addressed. The clinical impact of this technology is that genome editing can permanently correct disease-causing mutations and circumvent the hurdles of traditional gene- and cell-based therapies.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsGene EditingGenetic TherapyHumansMuscular Atrophy, SpinalMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneMyotonic Dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID27668807
PMCPMC5695221
OpenAlexW2527008945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.