SynthesisJAMA neurology2016
Genome Editing of Monogenic Neuromuscular Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JAMA neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 in mitigating cellular senescence and age-related disease progression.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 in mitigating cellular senescence and age-related disease progression.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas technologies in neurodegenerative disorders: mechanistic insights, therapeutic potential, and translational challenges.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Genome Editing Approaches Using Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs) for the Treatment of Motor Neuron Diseases.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- Viral and nonviral nanocarriers forNano research · 2024Article
- Metabolomics of cerebrospinal fluid reveals candidate diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish between spinal muscular atrophy type II and type III.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Partial Ablation of Non-Myogenic Progenitor Cells as a Therapeutic Approach to Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Brain Pathogenesis and Potential Therapeutic Strategies in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
- Various Aspects of a Gene Editing System-CRISPR-Cas9.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Novel PGD strategy based on single sperm linkage analysis for carriers of single gene pathogenic variant and chromosome reciprocal translocation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Development of a Facile Approach for Generating Chemically Modified CRISPR/Cas9 RNA.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- Long-term evaluation of AAV-CRISPR genome editing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Nature medicine · 2019Article
- Therapeutic potential of combined viral transduction and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in treating neurodegenerative diseases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018Review
- Myotonic Dystrophies: Targeting Therapies for Multisystem Disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018Review
- Molecular Therapies for Muscular Dystrophies.Current treatment options in neurology · 2018Review
- Congress report: A report of the 16th Congress of the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine.Regenerative therapy · 2018Article
- Genome engineering: a new approach to gene therapy for neuromuscular disorders.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2017Review
- Article
- CRISPR-Cpf1 correction of muscular dystrophy mutations in human cardiomyocytes and mice.Science advances · 2017Article
- Myotonic Dystrophies: State of the Art of New Therapeutic Developments for the CNS.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceMuscle weakness, the most common symptom of neuromuscular disease, may result from muscle dysfunction or may be caused indirectly by neuronal and neuromuscular junction abnormalities. To date, more than 780 monogenic neuromuscular diseases, linked to 417 different genes, have been identified in humans. Genome-editing methods, especially the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein 9) system, hold clinical potential for curing many monogenic disorders, including neuromuscular diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and myotonic dystrophy type 1.
objectivesTo provide an overview of genome-editing approaches; to summarize published reports on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of current genome-editing methods as they relate to the potential correction of monogenic neuromuscular diseases; and to highlight scientific and clinical opportunities and obstacles toward permanent correction of disease-causing mutations responsible for monogenic neuromuscular diseases by genome editing. EVIDENCE REVIEW: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for articles published from June 30, 1989, through June 9, 2016, using the following keywords: genome editing, CRISPR-Cas9, neuromuscular disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and myotonic dystrophy type 1. The following sources were reviewed: 341 articles describing different approaches to edit mammalian genomes; 330 articles describing CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in cell culture lines (in vitro) and animal models (in vivo); 16 websites used to generate single-guide RNA; 4 websites for off-target effects; and 382 articles describing viral and nonviral delivery systems. Articles describing neuromuscular diseases, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and myotonic dystrophy type 1, were also reviewed.
findingsMultiple proof-of-concept studies reveal the feasibility and efficacy of genome-editing-meditated correction of monogenic neuromuscular diseases in cultured cells and animal models. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Genome editing is a rapidly evolving technology with enormous translational potential once efficacy, delivery, and safety issues are addressed. The clinical impact of this technology is that genome editing can permanently correct disease-causing mutations and circumvent the hurdles of traditional gene- and cell-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.