ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2017
Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is it really a neuromyth? A meta-analysis of the learning styles matching hypothesis.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of a conceptual framework for predicting navigation performance in virtual reality.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Urban virtual environment landscape design and system based on PSO-BP neural network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Imagery and Verbal Strategies in Spatial Memory for Route and Survey Descriptions.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Individual differences in mental imagery modulate effective connectivity of scene-selective regions during resting state.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Map Learning in Aging Individuals: The Role of Cognitive Functioning and Visuospatial Factors.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Behavioural and cognitive mechanisms of Developmental Topographical Disorientation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions?Cognition · 2020Article
- Path Learning From Navigation in Aging: The Role of Cognitive Functioning and Wayfinding Inclinations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Identifying the cognitive processes underpinning hippocampal-dependent tasks.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2019Article
- How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2017Review
- Multiple brain activation patterns underlying successful visual short-term memory across the adult lifespan.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using novel virtual cities, we investigated the influence of verbal and visual strategies on the encoding of navigation-relevant information in a large-scale virtual environment. In 2 experiments, participants watched videos of routes through 4 virtual cities and were subsequently tested on their memory for observed landmarks and their ability to make judgments regarding the relative directions of the different landmarks along the route. In the first experiment, self-report questionnaires measuring visual and verbal cognitive styles were administered to examine correlations between cognitive styles, landmark recognition, and judgments of relative direction. Results demonstrate a tradeoff in which the verbal cognitive style is more beneficial for recognizing individual landmarks than for judging relative directions between them, whereas the visual cognitive style is more beneficial for judging relative directions than for landmark recognition. In a second experiment, we manipulated the use of verbal and visual strategies by varying task instructions given to separate groups of participants. Results confirm that a verbal strategy benefits landmark memory, whereas a visual strategy benefits judgments of relative direction. The manipulation of strategy by altering task instructions appears to trump individual differences in cognitive style. Taken together, we find that processing different details during route encoding, whether due to individual proclivities (Experiment 1) or task instructions (Experiment 2), results in benefits for different components of navigation-relevant information. These findings also highlight the value of considering multiple sources of individual differences as part of spatial cognition investigations. (PsycINFO Database Record
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.