ArticleJournal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders2016
Factor analysis of the Milwaukee Inventory for Subtypes of Trichotillomania-Adult Version.
Article in Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the Role of Homework Compliance in Acceptance-Enhanced Behavior Therapy for Trichotillomania.Behavior therapy · 2025Trial
- Acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy for trichotillomania in adults: A randomized clinical trial.Behaviour research and therapy · 2022Trial
- Trichotillomania and Risk of Alcohol- and Drug-Related Problems.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- Early maladaptive schemas in trichotillomania and skin-picking disorder: their relationships with symptom severity and subtypes.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of 1,234 individuals diagnosed with trichotillomania in the Swedish National Patient Register.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characteristics of trichotillomania and excoriation disorder across the lifespan.Psychiatry research · 2023Article
- Disentangling Reward Processing in Trichotillomania: 'Wanting' and 'Liking' Hair Pulling Have Distinct Clinical Correlates.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Milwaukee Inventory for Subtypes of Trichotillomania-Adult Version (MIST-A; Flessner et al., 2008) measures the degree to which hair pulling in Trichotillomania (TTM) can be described as "automatic" (i.e., done without awareness and unrelated to affective states) and/or "focused" (i.e., done with awareness and to regulate affective states). Despite preliminary evidence in support of the psychometric properties of the MIST-A, emerging research suggests the original factor structure may not optimally capture TTM phenomenology. Using data from a treatment-seeking TTM sample, the current study examined the factor structure of the MIST-A via exploratory factor analysis. The resulting two factor solution suggested the MIST-A consists of a 5-item "awareness of pulling" factor that measures the degree to which pulling is done with awareness and an 8-item "internal-regulated pulling" factor that measures the degree to which pulling is done to regulate internal stimuli (e.g., emotions, cognitions, and urges). Correlational analyses provided preliminary evidence for the validity of these derived factors. Findings from this study challenge the notions of "automatic" and "focused" pulling styles and suggest that researchers should continue to explore TTM subtypes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.