Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27668085›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2015

Perceived helpfulness of the individual components of a behavioural weight loss program: results from the Hopkins POWER Trial.

A T Dalcin, G J Jerome, S L Fitzpatrick, T A Louis, N-Y Wang, W L Bennett, N Durkin, J M Clark, G L Daumit, L J Appel and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04060329 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Measuring and Improving Coproduction Using coopeRATE: A Before-and-after Study in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled280ConditionsCystic Fibrosis, Chronic DiseaseArmscoopeRATE Prompt
NCT04696484 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Goal-based Agenda Setting Intervention for Informing Conversations in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2021 to 2021Enrolled219ConditionsCystic Fibrosis, Chronic DiseaseArmscoopeRATE Prompt
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A T DalcinDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA.
G J JeromeDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA; Department of Kinesiology Towson University Towson MD USA.
S L FitzpatrickDepartment of Preventive Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL USA.
T A LouisDepartment of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
N-Y WangDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA; Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
W L BennettDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA; Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
N DurkinDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
J M ClarkDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA; Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
G L DaumitDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA; Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
L J AppelDivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA; Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
J W CoughlinWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USRush University Medical Center · USTowson University · US

Funding

Integrated Clinical-Behavioral Interventions to Accomplish Weight LossU01HL087085 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI APPEL, LAWRENCE JOHN · 2006 to 2010
$5.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL087085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBehavioural weight loss programs are effective first-line treatments for obesity and are recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Gaining an understanding of intervention components that are found helpful by different demographic groups can improve tailoring of weight loss programs. This paper examined the perceived helpfulness of different weight loss program components.

methodsParticipants (

resultsThe components most frequently identified as helpful were individual telephone sessions (88%), tracking weight online (81%) and coach review of tracking (81%). The component least frequently rated as helpful was the primary care providers' general involvement (50%). Groups such as older adults, Blacks and those with lower education levels more frequently reported intervention components as helpful compared with their counterparts. DISCUSSION: Weight loss coaching delivered telephonically with web support was well received. Findings support the use of remote behavioural interventions for a wide variety of individuals.

Indexed as

Motivational Interviewingperceived helpfulnessprimary careweight loss

Identifiers

PMID27668085
PMCPMC5019229
OpenAlexW2215209340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.