Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27667129›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2017

Promoting similarity of model sparsity structures in integrative analysis of cancer genetic data.

Yuan Huang, Jin Liu, Huangdi Yi, Ben-Chang Shia, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Update on Statistical Boosting in Biomedicine.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuan HuangVA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, West Haven, CT; Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.
Jin LiuCenter of Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Huangdi YiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.
Ben-Chang ShiaSchool of Health Care Administration, Big Data Research Center & School of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shuangge MaVA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, West Haven, CT; Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID L RIMM · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Novel Methods for Integrative Analysis of Cancer Genomic DataR01CA142774 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In profiling studies, the analysis of a single dataset often leads to unsatisfactory results because of the small sample size. Multi-dataset analysis utilizes information of multiple independent datasets and outperforms single-dataset analysis. Among the available multi-dataset analysis methods, integrative analysis methods aggregate and analyze raw data and outperform meta-analysis methods, which analyze multiple datasets separately and then pool summary statistics. In this study, we conduct integrative analysis and marker selection under the heterogeneity structure, which allows different datasets to have overlapping but not necessarily identical sets of markers. Under certain scenarios, it is reasonable to expect some similarity of identified marker sets - or equivalently, similarity of model sparsity structures - across multiple datasets. However, the existing methods do not have a mechanism to explicitly promote such similarity. To tackle this problem, we develop a sparse boosting method. This method uses a BIC/HDBIC criterion to select weak learners in boosting and encourages sparsity. A new penalty is introduced to promote the similarity of model sparsity structures across datasets. The proposed method has a intuitive formulation and is broadly applicable and computationally affordable. In numerical studies, we analyze right censored survival data under the accelerated failure time model. Simulation shows that the proposed method outperforms alternative boosting and penalization methods with more accurate marker identification. The analysis of three breast cancer prognosis datasets shows that the proposed method can identify marker sets with increased similarity across datasets and improved prediction performance. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorGenetic Markersheterogeneity structureintegrative analysismarker identificationmodel sparsity structuresparse boosting

Identifiers

PMID27667129
PMCPMC5209260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.