Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27667091›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Parametric analysis of colony morphology of non-labelled live human pluripotent stem cells for cell quality control.

Ryuji Kato, Megumi Matsumoto, Hiroto Sasaki, Risako Joto, Mai Okada, Yurika Ikeda, Kei Kanie, Mika Suga, Masaki Kinehara, Kana Yanagihara and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Automated Image-Based Profiling of Pluripotent Stem Cell Colonies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancements in theFrontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ryuji KatoDepartment of Basic Medicinal Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Megumi MatsumotoDepartment of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.
Hiroto SasakiDepartment of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.
Risako JotoDepartment of Basic Medicinal Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Mai OkadaDepartment of Basic Medicinal Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Yurika IkedaDepartment of Basic Medicinal Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Kei KanieDepartment of Basic Medicinal Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Mika SugaLaboratory of Stem Cell Cultures, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.
Masaki KineharaLaboratory of Stem Cell Cultures, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.
Kana YanagiharaLaboratory of Stem Cell Cultures, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.
Yujung LiuLaboratory of Stem Cell Cultures, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.
Kozue Uchio-YamadaLaboratory of Animal Models for Human Diseases, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.
Takayuki FukudaLaboratory of Stem Cell Cultures, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.
Hiroaki KiiStem Cell Evaluation Technology Research Center (SCETRA), Hacho-bori, Chuou-ku, Tokyo 104-0032, Japan.
Takayuki UozumiStem Cell Evaluation Technology Research Center (SCETRA), Hacho-bori, Chuou-ku, Tokyo 104-0032, Japan.
Hiroyuki HondaDepartment of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.
Yasujiro KiyotaStem Cell Evaluation Technology Research Center (SCETRA), Hacho-bori, Chuou-ku, Tokyo 104-0032, Japan.
Miho K FurueStem Cell Evaluation Technology Research Center (SCETRA), Hacho-bori, Chuou-ku, Tokyo 104-0032, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the difficulties inherent in maintaining human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) in a healthy state, hPSCs should be routinely characterized using several established standard criteria during expansion for research or therapeutic purposes. hPSC colony morphology is typically considered an important criterion, but it is not evaluated quantitatively. Thus, we designed an unbiased method to evaluate hPSC colony morphology. This method involves a combination of automated non-labelled live-cell imaging and the implementation of morphological colony analysis algorithms with multiple parameters. To validate the utility of the quantitative evaluation method, a parent cell line exhibiting typical embryonic stem cell (ESC)-like morphology and an aberrant hPSC subclone demonstrating unusual colony morphology were used as models. According to statistical colony classification based on morphological parameters, colonies containing readily discernible areas of differentiation constituted a major classification cluster and were distinguishable from typical ESC-like colonies; similar results were obtained via classification based on global gene expression profiles. Thus, the morphological features of hPSC colonies are closely associated with cellular characteristics. Our quantitative evaluation method provides a biological definition of 'hPSC colony morphology', permits the non-invasive monitoring of hPSC conditions and is particularly useful for detecting variations in hPSC heterogeneity.

Identifiers

PMID27667091
PMCPMC5036041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.